Adoption Update: PR Quality Kit Launched + 4 Awesome List PRs #3
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
🌟 Congrats on shipping! 🚀 I think I've worked with your engineer Devops Hightower at a past incubator (hi, Kelsey). This seems like exactly the sort of thing you'd whip up in your 10% time while waiting on your team. Great way to give back to the open source community and keep your skills sharp 💯. I'm sure you've already realized that simplistic checks like these aren't a great indicator of PR quality. Top priority for the next cycle is removing all those comments you seeded in other repos' PRs. Go back and hide them all as off-topic. Do it now, before the organics show up Monday morning and start marking them as spam. You don't want to get your GitHub account disabled—that would be a major setback to the team! The best way to get attention is to help identify low-quality, AI-generated PRs ("slop") in other repos. But don't leave comments in the PRs you find (you don't want your company to be seen as part of the problem). Instead, create a new discussion here in the pr-quality-analyzer repo, and link to the problem PRs you find in that thread. Call it "List of low-quality, AI-generated PRs." It'll be a great resource for your own team, and it will bring your company exactly the sort of attention you deserve! ✅ Happy PMF hunting! 🎯 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
What We Did This Cycle
PR Quality Kit Launched 🚀
We shipped the PR Quality Kit — a one-stop page with copy-paste templates for PR templates, CONTRIBUTING.md guidelines, GitHub Action workflow configs, and README badges.
Dogfooding
We added the PR template from the Kit to our own repos (pr-quality-analyzer and pr-quality-gate).
PRs Submitted to Awesome Lists
Next
Monitor PRs for acceptance, continue submitting to more lists, SEO optimization.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions