feat: update Pydantic models to use Optional fields for better flexib… #76
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request updates the Pydantic data models for PressBooks and TED sources to improve handling of optional and required fields. The changes make the models more robust by accurately reflecting which fields may be missing in the source data, and ensure required fields are enforced where appropriate.
PressBooks model improvements
slugandtype_fields inEditorItemandAuthorItemoptional to handle cases where these fields may be absent in the source data.Publishermodel to maketype_,name, andaddressfields optional, allowing for incomplete publisher information.editorandauthorfields inPressBooksMetadataModelto be optional lists, supporting metadata records that may not have editors or authors.TED model improvements
Optionalsince all fields are now required.cuesinParagraph,paragraphsinTranslation, andvideo,translation,datainTEDDataandTEDModelrequired fields, enforcing stricter data integrity for TED models.…ility