Skip to content

Conversation

@jd
Copy link
Contributor

@jd jd commented Mar 18, 2020

This test can be false in Python 2.7 (at least) since it's possible that we
catch the profiler background thread using a lock — the Python 2 threading
module uses one.

Only do a check based on the lock name, that ought to be enough.

This test can be false in Python 2.7 (at least) since it's possible that we
catch the profiler background thread using a lock — the Python 2 threading
module uses one.

Only do a check based on the lock name, that ought to be enough.
@jd jd requested a review from a team as a code owner March 18, 2020 12:24
@jd
Copy link
Contributor Author

jd commented Mar 18, 2020

Opened #1285 for the test failure on httplib.

@jd jd merged commit f6dbdb2 into DataDog:master Mar 18, 2020
@jd jd deleted the profile/fix-profile-transient-fail-test-fork branch March 18, 2020 13:20
codeboten pushed a commit to lightstep/ls-trace-py that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2020
…#1282)

This test can be false in Python 2.7 (at least) since it's possible that we
catch the profiler background thread using a lock — the Python 2 threading
module uses one.

Only do a check based on the lock name, that ought to be enough.
@majorgreys majorgreys added this to the 0.36.0 milestone Mar 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants