Skip to content

Conversation

@portbusy
Copy link
Contributor

@portbusy portbusy commented Dec 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new device, jtmf04, enhancing the functionality and control of the Deebot vacuum.
    • Expanded capabilities for device monitoring, including battery status, cleaning actions, and advanced features like continuous cleaning.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved test coverage for device initialization and capabilities, ensuring accurate mapping of commands and events for various device classes.
  • Documentation

    • Added a new file detailing the capabilities and commands associated with the jtmf04 device.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Walkthrough

A new file named jtmf04.py has been introduced to the deebot_client/hardware/deebot/ directory. This file defines a StaticDeviceInfo instance for a vacuum device, encapsulating various capabilities and events related to its operation, such as battery status, cleaning actions, and error handling. Additionally, modifications have been made to the test suite in tests/hardware/test_init.py to include the new device identifier and enhance the testing of device capabilities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py New file created defining vacuum device capabilities and events.
tests/hardware/test_init.py Updated tests to include new device identifier "jtmf04" and enhanced capability event extraction.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add DEEBOT T10 TURBO #489: The changes in this PR involve adding capabilities and commands for a vacuum cleaner, similar to the functionalities defined in jtmf04.py for the new vacuum device.
  • Add support for Deebot N8 #613: This PR introduces a new file that defines capabilities for a robotic vacuum, including a StaticDeviceInfo instance, which is directly related to the functionalities encapsulated in jtmf04.py.
  • Add support for Deebot N8 Pro+ #617: Similar to the main PR, this PR adds a new file that defines capabilities for a robotic vacuum, including a StaticDeviceInfo instance, indicating a parallel development in device functionality.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
A new file hops in today.
With bytes and bits, it finds its way,
A jolly change for us to say!
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between aa7b6e9 and 1908194.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py

1-1: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.

(B018)


1-1: Undefined name p1jij8

(F821)

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
p1jij8.py
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: File appears to be incomplete or incorrectly committed

The file jtmf04.py appears to be either incomplete or incorrectly committed. The current content looks like a filename rather than actual Python code. For proper Deebot T10 support, we would expect:

  1. Proper Python module structure
  2. Implementation classes/functions
  3. Documentation
  4. Required imports
  5. Actual functionality related to Deebot T10

Could you please clarify:

  1. Is this an accidental commit?
  2. If not, could you provide the intended implementation for Deebot T10 support?

I can assist in generating a proper implementation template if needed.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

1-1: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.

(B018)


1-1: Undefined name p1jij8

(F821)

@edenhaus edenhaus added the pr: new-feature PR, which adds a new feature label Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/hardware/test_init.py (1)

267-267: Consider adding specific test cases for Deebot T10

While adding the device to test_all_models_loaded is correct, consider enhancing test coverage by adding specific test cases for this device in test_capabilities_event_extraction.

Add a test case similar to existing ones:

@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    ("class_", "expected"),
    [
+       (
+           "jtmf04",
+           {
+               AdvancedModeEvent: [GetAdvancedMode()],
+               AvailabilityEvent: [GetBattery(is_available_check=True)],
+               # ... add all expected events and commands
+           },
+       ),
        # ... existing test cases
    ],
-    ids=["5xu9h3", "itk04l", "yna5xi", "p95mgv"],
+    ids=["5xu9h3", "itk04l", "yna5xi", "p95mgv", "jtmf04"],
)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1908194 and 1b7608c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/hardware/test_init.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py (2)

1-1: ⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Remove incorrect first line

The first line contains "p1jij8.py" which appears to be an artifact or incorrect content. This line should be removed as it's not valid Python code and could cause syntax errors.

-p1jij8.py

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


Line range hint 1-267: LGTM: Comprehensive vacuum device configuration

The StaticDeviceInfo configuration is well-structured and includes all essential capabilities for a vacuum device:

  • Basic operations (battery, charging, cleaning)
  • Advanced features (mapping, water control, fan speed)
  • Safety features (error handling)
  • Maintenance features (life span tracking)

Let's verify this configuration against other vacuum device configurations:

✅ Verification successful

Let's gather more information to compare the capabilities with other vacuum devices:


LGTM: Comprehensive and consistent vacuum device configuration

The configuration aligns perfectly with other vacuum device configurations in the codebase. All essential capabilities are present and properly structured:

  • Core capabilities (battery, charging, cleaning) match other models
  • Advanced features (mapping, water control, fan speed) are consistent
  • Event handling and settings follow the standard pattern
  • Work mode configuration includes all required modes (MOP, VACUUM, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare capabilities with other vacuum devices
# Expected: Similar capability structure across vacuum devices

# Find all vacuum device configurations
echo "Searching for other vacuum device configurations..."
rg -l "device_type=DeviceType.VACUUM" "deebot_client/hardware/deebot/"

# Check for any unique capabilities in this device
echo "Checking for unique capabilities..."
rg "Capabilities\(" "deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py" -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 1025


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Compare capabilities with another vacuum device (e.g., x5d34r.py) to verify consistency
echo "Comparing with x5d34r.py capabilities..."
rg "Capabilities\(" "deebot_client/hardware/deebot/x5d34r.py" -A 20

# Check for any missing standard capabilities
echo "Checking for standard capabilities in other models..."
for file in deebot_client/hardware/deebot/*.py; do
    if [ "$file" != "deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py" ]; then
        echo "=== $file ==="
        rg "CapabilitySet|CapabilityEvent|CapabilityExecute|CapabilityClean" "$file" | sort | uniq
    fi
done

Length of output: 68692

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.42%. Comparing base (aa7b6e9) to head (8fd422d).
Report is 2 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #618   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.42%   86.42%           
=======================================
  Files          88       88           
  Lines        3301     3301           
  Branches      298      298           
=======================================
  Hits         2853     2853           
  Misses        394      394           
  Partials       54       54           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@edenhaus edenhaus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @portbusy 👍

@Thunderbird1982
Copy link

Ecovacs Deebot T10 Turbo

does the t10 turbo also work or only the t10

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr: new-feature PR, which adds a new feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants