-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
Add support for Deebot T10 #618
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughA new file named Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py
1-1: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
(B018)
1-1: Undefined name p1jij8
(F821)
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| p1jij8.py | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Critical: File appears to be incomplete or incorrectly committed
The file jtmf04.py appears to be either incomplete or incorrectly committed. The current content looks like a filename rather than actual Python code. For proper Deebot T10 support, we would expect:
- Proper Python module structure
- Implementation classes/functions
- Documentation
- Required imports
- Actual functionality related to Deebot T10
Could you please clarify:
- Is this an accidental commit?
- If not, could you provide the intended implementation for Deebot T10 support?
I can assist in generating a proper implementation template if needed.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
1-1: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
(B018)
1-1: Undefined name p1jij8
(F821)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
tests/hardware/test_init.py (1)
267-267: Consider adding specific test cases for Deebot T10While adding the device to
test_all_models_loadedis correct, consider enhancing test coverage by adding specific test cases for this device intest_capabilities_event_extraction.Add a test case similar to existing ones:
@pytest.mark.parametrize( ("class_", "expected"), [ + ( + "jtmf04", + { + AdvancedModeEvent: [GetAdvancedMode()], + AvailabilityEvent: [GetBattery(is_available_check=True)], + # ... add all expected events and commands + }, + ), # ... existing test cases ], - ids=["5xu9h3", "itk04l", "yna5xi", "p95mgv"], + ids=["5xu9h3", "itk04l", "yna5xi", "p95mgv", "jtmf04"], )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py(1 hunks)tests/hardware/test_init.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py (2)
1-1:
Critical: Remove incorrect first line
The first line contains "p1jij8.py" which appears to be an artifact or incorrect content. This line should be removed as it's not valid Python code and could cause syntax errors.
-p1jij8.pyLikely invalid or redundant comment.
Line range hint 1-267: LGTM: Comprehensive vacuum device configuration
The StaticDeviceInfo configuration is well-structured and includes all essential capabilities for a vacuum device:
- Basic operations (battery, charging, cleaning)
- Advanced features (mapping, water control, fan speed)
- Safety features (error handling)
- Maintenance features (life span tracking)
Let's verify this configuration against other vacuum device configurations:
✅ Verification successful
Let's gather more information to compare the capabilities with other vacuum devices:
LGTM: Comprehensive and consistent vacuum device configuration
The configuration aligns perfectly with other vacuum device configurations in the codebase. All essential capabilities are present and properly structured:
- Core capabilities (battery, charging, cleaning) match other models
- Advanced features (mapping, water control, fan speed) are consistent
- Event handling and settings follow the standard pattern
- Work mode configuration includes all required modes (MOP, VACUUM, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare capabilities with other vacuum devices
# Expected: Similar capability structure across vacuum devices
# Find all vacuum device configurations
echo "Searching for other vacuum device configurations..."
rg -l "device_type=DeviceType.VACUUM" "deebot_client/hardware/deebot/"
# Check for any unique capabilities in this device
echo "Checking for unique capabilities..."
rg "Capabilities\(" "deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 1025
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Compare capabilities with another vacuum device (e.g., x5d34r.py) to verify consistency
echo "Comparing with x5d34r.py capabilities..."
rg "Capabilities\(" "deebot_client/hardware/deebot/x5d34r.py" -A 20
# Check for any missing standard capabilities
echo "Checking for standard capabilities in other models..."
for file in deebot_client/hardware/deebot/*.py; do
if [ "$file" != "deebot_client/hardware/deebot/jtmf04.py" ]; then
echo "=== $file ==="
rg "CapabilitySet|CapabilityEvent|CapabilityExecute|CapabilityClean" "$file" | sort | uniq
fi
done
Length of output: 68692
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #618 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 86.42% 86.42%
=======================================
Files 88 88
Lines 3301 3301
Branches 298 298
=======================================
Hits 2853 2853
Misses 394 394
Partials 54 54 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
edenhaus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @portbusy 👍
|
Ecovacs Deebot T10 Turbo does the t10 turbo also work or only the t10 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
jtmf04, enhancing the functionality and control of the Deebot vacuum.Bug Fixes
Documentation
jtmf04device.