Skip to content

Conversation

@stevenroose
Copy link
Contributor

We use the rust-bitcoin types. I know we should in the long term move away from that, but for now we still have several of the types that we reuse.

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

+1.

Can you add a commit which bumps the minor version so we can publish?

Copy link
Member

@apoelstra apoelstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. waiting on travis

@stevenroose
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased.

Copy link
Collaborator

@jonasnick jonasnick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ACK

@stevenroose
Copy link
Contributor Author

@apoelstra Can this go in or is there something else that needs to go first?

@apoelstra
Copy link
Member

I thought (from you) that we were waiting on #31?

@stevenroose
Copy link
Contributor Author

@apoelstra Ah huh I somehow closed that one. I didn't see it in the PR list so I thought it was merged. Yeah so that one please first.

@jonasnick
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like this needs another rebase

@stevenroose
Copy link
Contributor Author

rebased

jonasnick added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2019
f1f91d6 Export bitcoin dependency (Steven Roose)

Pull request description:

  We use the rust-bitcoin types. I know we should in the long term move away from that, but for now we still have several of the types that we reuse.

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: da1905b574b4d575dcc28852f8992e2325c801124cca611755f0aec2e847c647ec0d6f01b0a60291211e46a51c78d669d0b9c9154410ba1e534e978d08098821
@jonasnick jonasnick merged commit f1f91d6 into ElementsProject:master Oct 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants