Skip to content

Conversation

@avik-pal
Copy link
Collaborator

@avik-pal avik-pal requested review from giordano and wsmoses October 17, 2025 13:04
@avik-pal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@wsmoses

external/xla/xla/pjrt/common_pjrt_client.cc: In lambda function:
external/xla/xla/pjrt/common_pjrt_client.cc:787:73: error: 'tsl::internal::FutureBase<T, is_move_only>::FutureBase(U&&) [with U = absl::lts_20250814::Status; std::enable_if_t<(is_constructible_v<T, U> || is_same_v<T, U>)>* <anonymous> = 0; T = absl::lts_20250814::StatusOr<xla::MutableLiteralBase*>; bool is_move_only = false]' is protected within this context
  787 |         FailedPrecondition("ToLiteral generator should never be called"));
      |                                                                         ^
In file included from external/xla/xla/future.h:19,
                 from external/xla/xla/pjrt/common_pjrt_client.h:36,
                 from external/xla/xla/pjrt/common_pjrt_client.cc:16:
external/xla/xla/tsl/concurrency/future.h:169:12: note: declared protected here
  169 |   explicit FutureBase(U&& value)
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~

This seems to be from the enzyme bump. Though on hydra the build seems to go through for me

@avik-pal avik-pal merged commit 3bd7508 into main Oct 17, 2025
6 of 12 checks passed
@avik-pal avik-pal deleted the ap/remove_certain_fields branch October 17, 2025 22:55
@wsmoses
Copy link
Member

wsmoses commented Oct 17, 2025

cc @giordano we need to force the local jll builds to use clang (18) too.

theres a gcc issue here, that isnt worth fixing imo

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants