Deprecate getAccessToken #272
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stainless-app
bot
requested review from
a team,
diaswrd and
tessfinch
and removed request for
a team
stainless-app
bot
force-pushed
the
sam/deprecate-get-auth-token
branch
from
c9f9772 to
45b0ff7
Compare
Contributor
|
@dtmeadows FYI I reverted your change to the example file, |
stainless-app
bot
force-pushed
the
sam/deprecate-get-auth-token
branch
3 times, most recently
from
28d353e to
b1d464c
Compare
arditP
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2024
stainless-app
bot
force-pushed
the
sam/deprecate-get-auth-token
branch
from
b1d464c to
d973612
Compare
Merged
stainless-app bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2024
…s().create() (#272) Co-authored-by: Samuel El-Borai <sam@elborai.me>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In other SDKs
getAccessTokenhas been deprecated in favor ofclient.accessTokens().create(). That has been missed in the Java SDK.