Change application to configuration where appropriate to match Partner Portal changes

[Jeremy1026]

Relevant Ticket or Conversation:

https://gitlab.login.gov/lg-teams/FIE/partner-portal-prod-edition/-/issues/184

Description of Changes:

Replaces all instances of "app" or "application" with "configuration" in the developer documentation to match the changes made in Partner Portal. This is a companion PR to a Merge Request in identity-dashboard.

MR Checklist:

1. Have you linted and tested your code locally prior to submission?
2. Have you tagged the appropriate dev(s) for review?
3. Have you linked to any relevant tickets or conversations?

MR Review Standards:

• Consider using Conventional Comments to ensure that your feedback is clear and actionable.
• Ideally, MRs should be reviewed by at least 2 team members.
• All MRs must be approved before being merged.

[mmagsa]

Question: is the \ at the end intentional, or a typo? (if not a typo: what does it do?)

[Jeremy1026]

It is a typo!

[mmagsa]

Question/Suggestion: could we say integration configuration instead of just configuration in most cases? Since this is the dev docs and not the portal I feel like that would be clearer / less ambiguous.

[Jeremy1026]

Question/Suggestion: could we say integration configuration instead of just configuration in most cases? Since this is the dev docs and not the portal I feel like that would be clearer / less ambiguous.

We use application's configuration in a few places. I'll match that pattern.

[mmagsa]

Question/Suggestion: could we say integration configuration instead of just configuration in most cases? Since this is the dev docs and not the portal I feel like that would be clearer / less ambiguous.

We use application's configuration in a few places. I'll match that pattern.

I'm concerned that using "application configuration" would make it not clear whether we're talking about the actual configuration of their application, or their integration config in the portal.

[nprimak]

Yeah I have to agree with @mmagsa we need to disambiguate the terms so when we use them together it isn't confusing what we are referring to. Though a new dev doc page that actually defines each term (integration, configuration, application) would go a long way towards helping make this clear. That would be out of scope for this ticket.

[Jeremy1026]

Alrighty, flipped all "application configuration" to "integration configuration"

[mmagsa]

Looks good to me!