Skip to content

fix: getting correct tx exons#107

Merged
korikuzma merged 2 commits intostagingfrom
issue-105
Oct 13, 2022
Merged

fix: getting correct tx exons#107
korikuzma merged 2 commits intostagingfrom
issue-105

Conversation

@korikuzma
Copy link
Member

close #105

I'm kind of hesitant on if this will affect getting MANE data when going from genomic --> tx exon. The test suite should be expanded, but need further time to think of examples where we might not be able to get GRCh38 data and have to use GRCh37. @jsstevenson if you can't think of any either, I can make a separate issue for this. Maybe @jarbesfeld might have some examples from data he's been looking at to help with this?

@korikuzma korikuzma requested a review from jsstevenson October 12, 2022 20:19
@korikuzma korikuzma self-assigned this Oct 12, 2022
@korikuzma korikuzma linked an issue Oct 12, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
jsstevenson
jsstevenson previously approved these changes Oct 13, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jsstevenson jsstevenson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 looks fine to me, but I wouldn't know when we have to use GRCh37. Sounds like a question for someone with experience in a graduate biology program

@korikuzma
Copy link
Member Author

@jsstevenson it was bothering me, so I'm about to push an additional change that makes me more confident.

if genomic ac is provided, use that assembly. else, use grch38 by
default
@korikuzma korikuzma merged commit 6223d30 into staging Oct 13, 2022
@korikuzma korikuzma deleted the issue-105 branch October 13, 2022 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ending exon mismatch with RefSeq

2 participants