Skip to content

Conversation

@carlospolop
Copy link
Collaborator

🤖 Automated Content Update

This PR was automatically generated by the HackTricks News Bot based on a technical blog post.

📝 Source Information

  • Blog URL: https://sensepost.com/blog/2025/noooooooooo-touch/
  • Blog Title: Noooooooo Touch! – Bypassing IR No-Touch Exit Sensors with a Covert IR Torch
  • Suggested Section: 😎 Hardware/Physical Access -> Physical Attacks -> IR Proximity Exit Sensor Bypass / Optical Injection Against No-Touch Door Sensors

🎯 Content Summary

This blog post details a practical, hardware-level bypass of cheap infrared (IR) "no-touch" exit sensors that control access-controlled doors. These sensors are typically used on the egress side of doors that require a credential (RFID, fingerprint, etc.) to enter, but only a hand wave to leave. The author reverse-engineers the sensor, characterises its IR signalling, and then builds a covert IR injection device embedded inside a flashlight (torch) that can open such doors from outside by spo...

🔧 Technical Details

IR carrier spoofing against proximity-based exit sensors.
Many low-cost "no-touch" exit sensors emit a near-infrared carrier (≈30 kHz) and rely on a narrow-band IR receiver to detect reflections from nearby objects like a hand. The receiver outputs high when it sees several pulses (typically 4–10) of the correct carrier frequency, and the controller then energises a relay to open the door. Because the receiver does not authenticate the source or direction of the IR, an attacker can remove or ignore the built-in emitter and instead inject a strong, external IR signal with a similar carrier pattern. As long as the external modulation meets the receiver’s pulse and timing requirements, it will be misinterpreted as a valid reflection from a close object, causing the relay to trigger and unlocking the door.


Leveraging post-detection waveforms and burst transmission.
Some sensors change their emitter waveform after they detect a valid ...

🤖 Agent Actions

Summary:

  • Added a new “Covert IR Injection Against No-Touch Exit Sensors” section to src/hardware-physical-access/physical-attacks.md detailing how ~30 kHz IR exit sensors operate, how their post-detection waveform can be replayed with gated bursts, and how reflections plus high-power LEDs enable long-range triggering.
  • Documented the covert flashlight/torch build (ATtiny412 driver, MOSFET-switching IR LED, haptic feedback, modulation cycling) and provided practical mitigations for defenders.
  • Updated the References list with the SensePost blog source.

These changes integrate the new hardware attack technique into the existing physical attacks page with proper citing.


This PR was automatically created by the HackTricks Feed Bot. Please review the changes carefully before merging.

@carlospolop
Copy link
Collaborator Author

🔗 Additional Context

Original Blog Post: https://sensepost.com/blog/2025/noooooooooo-touch/

Content Categories: Based on the analysis, this content was categorized under "😎 Hardware/Physical Access -> Physical Attacks -> IR Proximity Exit Sensor Bypass / Optical Injection Against No-Touch Door Sensors".

Repository Maintenance:

  • MD Files Formatting: 909 files processed

Review Notes:

  • This content was automatically processed and may require human review for accuracy
  • Check that the placement within the repository structure is appropriate
  • Verify that all technical details are correct and up-to-date
  • All .md files have been checked for proper formatting (headers, includes, etc.)

Bot Version: HackTricks News Bot v1.0

@carlospolop
Copy link
Collaborator Author

merge

@carlospolop carlospolop merged commit fabd4a6 into master Nov 21, 2025
@carlospolop carlospolop deleted the update_Noooooooo_Touch____Bypassing_IR_No-Touch_Exit_Sens_20251119_182937 branch November 21, 2025 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants