Skip to content

Conversation

@woodruffw
Copy link
Member

@woodruffw woodruffw commented Jul 8, 2018

TODO:

  • Update FatFile#new_from_machos to allow emission of FatArch64.

Closes #101.

@woodruffw
Copy link
Member Author

I ended up going the same route as lipo, erroring (throwing an exception) if the user attempts to create a fat Mach-O without explicitly requesting fat_arch_64. This is much simpler to implement, and much more efficient than the transparent upgrade from fat_arch to fat_arch_64 would have been.

@woodruffw woodruffw changed the title [WIP] macho: FatArch64 support macho: FatArch64 support Aug 3, 2018
@woodruffw woodruffw merged commit 1534cbb into master Aug 4, 2018
@woodruffw woodruffw deleted the fat-arch-64 branch August 4, 2018 02:55
@lock lock bot added the outdated label Jan 1, 2020
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 1, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FatArch64

2 participants