Skip to content

Conversation

@ArturoAmorQ
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #603.

This PR implements the conservative solution proposed in this comment at the expense of the more radical solution proposed in this other comment.

ArturoAmorQ and others added 21 commits March 14, 2022 10:37
Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
@ArturoAmorQ ArturoAmorQ changed the title N estimators Emphasize good practice of not tuning n_estimators Sep 8, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@ogrisel ogrisel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some more feed back but otherwise LGTM. Thanks @ArturoAmorQ.

Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org>
@ArturoAmorQ ArturoAmorQ merged commit c254e90 into INRIA:main Oct 18, 2022
@ArturoAmorQ ArturoAmorQ deleted the n_estimators branch October 18, 2022 08:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Tuning n_estimators for RandomForests doesn't make sense

2 participants