Skip to content

Conversation

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 6, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 64.84848% with 58 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 63.12%. Comparing base (4bcae2a) to head (08bd968).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/LazyNamedDimsArrays/evaluation_order.jl 30.76% 36 Missing ⚠️
src/tensornetwork.jl 66.66% 10 Missing ⚠️
src/LazyNamedDimsArrays/lazynameddimsarray.jl 16.66% 5 Missing ⚠️
src/LazyNamedDimsArrays/lazyinterface.jl 80.95% 4 Missing ⚠️
src/contract_network.jl 91.66% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #21      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.92%   63.12%   -0.80%     
==========================================
  Files          19       20       +1     
  Lines         607      697      +90     
==========================================
+ Hits          388      440      +52     
- Misses        219      257      +38     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mtfishman mtfishman changed the title [WIP] Eager contraction sequence/order optimization Eager contraction sequence/order optimization Nov 10, 2025
@mtfishman mtfishman marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2025 17:57
@mtfishman mtfishman merged commit 929b62d into main Nov 10, 2025
14 checks passed
@mtfishman mtfishman deleted the mf/eager-order branch November 10, 2025 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants