Skip to content

Conversation

@kmsquire
Copy link
Member

This is a resubmission of #98, which I was too slow to merge before. It's a minor change, and if there's reason not to do this, it can easily be reverted later. But it's a small step in the right direction to cleaning up Stack and Queue (and Deque) types.

(Original PR from @andrewcooke; he still owns the commit.)

@kmsquire kmsquire force-pushed the kms/ac/hide_stack_queue_implementation branch from 5952118 to 8d582cf Compare January 14, 2016 06:53
@kmsquire kmsquire force-pushed the kms/ac/hide_stack_queue_implementation branch from 8d582cf to ff2479d Compare January 14, 2016 06:55
@DanielArndt
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM, I was always a little curious why the type was exposed like that.

@hayd
Copy link
Contributor

hayd commented Jan 14, 2016

+1 a related change is adding eltype for many types, I have a branch but will rebase off this once merged.

kmsquire added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2016
…entation

RFC: change type to hide implementation
@kmsquire kmsquire merged commit f13ba0d into master Jan 14, 2016
@kmsquire kmsquire deleted the kms/ac/hide_stack_queue_implementation branch July 13, 2017 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants