Skip to content

Conversation

@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

@fredrikekre fredrikekre commented Sep 16, 2022

This patch updates SparseArrays. In particular it contains JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#260 which is necessary to make progress in #46759.

All changes:

@ViralBShah
Copy link
Member

Shouldn't we be using BumpStdlibs for this?

@ViralBShah ViralBShah added the sparse Sparse arrays label Sep 18, 2022
This patch updates SparseArrays. In particular it contains
JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#260 which is
necessary to make progress in #46759.

All changes:
 - Fix ambiguities with Base. (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#268)
 - add == for vectors (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#248)
 - add undef initializers (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#263)
 - Make sure reductions benefit from sparsity (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#244)
 - Remove fkeep! from the documentation (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#261)
 - Fix direction of circshift (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#260)
 - Fix `vcat` of sparse vectors with numbers (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#253)
 - decrement should always return a vector (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#241)
 - change order of arguments in fkeep, fix bug with fixed elements (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#240)
 - Sparse matrix/vectors with fixed sparsity pattern. (JuliaSparse/SparseArrays.jl#201)
@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member Author

fredrikekre commented Sep 23, 2022

Didn't think it mattered, and I already had this patch locally.

@fredrikekre fredrikekre merged commit 6fdcfd4 into master Sep 27, 2022
@fredrikekre fredrikekre deleted the fe/sparseup branch September 27, 2022 08:37
vtjnash referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2022
If they are encountered in a Julia object directly, as opposed to
e.g. during serialization of a method instance, we'll have first
populated the backref table as part of jl_serialize_value, so we
need to skip that check during code instance serialization.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

sparse Sparse arrays

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants