Skip to content

Conversation

tmigot
Copy link
Member

@tmigot tmigot commented Jul 7, 2023

Check allocations for model modifiers of NLS: Error During Test at NLPModelsModifiers.jl\test\allocs_test.jl:29
  Got exception outside of a @test
  StackOverflowError:
  Stacktrace:
    [1] SlackNLSModel(model::BNDROSENBROCK{Float64, Vector{Float64}}; name::String)
      @ NLPModelsModifiers NLPModelsModifiers.jl\src\slack-model.jl:167
    [2] SlackNLSModel
      @ NLPModelsModifiers.jl\src\slack-model.jl:167 [inlined]
    [3] FeasibilityResidual(nlp::BNDROSENBROCK{Float64, Vector{Float64}}; name::String) (repeats 8699 times)
      @ NLPModelsModifiers NLPModelsModifiers.jl\src\feasibility-residual.jl:54
    [4] (::var"#108#118")(x::String)
      @ Main NLPModelsModifiers.jl\test\allocs_test.jl:51
    [5] iterate
      @ .\generator.jl:47 [inlined]
    [6] collect_to!(dest::Vector{FeasibilityResidual{Float64, Vector{Float64}, SlackNLSModel{Float64, Vector{Float64}, LLS{Float64, Vector{Float64}}}}}, itr::Base.Generator{Vector{String}, var"#108#118"}, offs::Int64, st::Int64)  
      @ Base .\array.jl:840
    [7] collect_to_with_first!(dest::Vector{FeasibilityResidual{Float64, Vector{Float64}, SlackNLSModel{Float64, Vector{Float64}, LLS{Float64, Vector{Float64}}}}}, v1::FeasibilityResidual{Float64, Vector{Float64}, SlackNLSModel{Float64, Vector{Float64}, LLS{Float64, Vector{Float64}}}}, itr::Base.Generator{Vector{String}, var"#108#118"}, st::Int64)
      @ Base .\array.jl:818
    [8] _collect(c::Vector{String}, itr::Base.Generator{Vector{String}, var"#108#118"}, #unused#::Base.EltypeUnknown, isz::Base.HasShape{1})
      @ Base .\array.jl:812
    [9] collect_similar(cont::Vector{String}, itr::Base.Generator{Vector{String}, var"#108#118"})
      @ Base .\array.jl:711
   [10] map(f::Function, A::Vector{String})
      @ Base .\abstractarray.jl:3261
   [11] include(fname::String)
      @ Base.MainInclude .\client.jl:478
   [12] include(fname::String)
      @ Base.MainInclude .\client.jl:478
   [13] eval
      @ .\boot.jl:370 [inlined]
   [14] exec_options(opts::Base.JLOptions)
      @ Base .\client.jl:280
   [15] _start()
      @ Base .\client.jl:522

@tmigot tmigot added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 7, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2023

Package name latest stable
ADNLPModels.jl
AmplNLReader.jl
CUTEst.jl
CaNNOLeS.jl
DCI.jl
FletcherPenaltySolver.jl
JSOSolvers.jl
LLSModels.jl
NLPModelsIpopt.jl
NLPModelsJuMP.jl
NLPModelsTest.jl
Percival.jl
QuadraticModels.jl
SolverBenchmark.jl
SolverTools.jl

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 7, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (948eb89) 97.35% compared to head (600bc6e) 97.36%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #104      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.35%   97.36%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         869      873       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits          846      850       +4     
  Misses         23       23              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/feasibility-residual.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 7, 2023

Package name latest stable
ADNLPModels.jl
AmplNLReader.jl
CUTEst.jl
CaNNOLeS.jl
DCI.jl
FletcherPenaltySolver.jl
JSOSolvers.jl
LLSModels.jl
NLPModelsIpopt.jl
NLPModelsJuMP.jl
NLPModelsTest.jl
Percival.jl
QuadraticModels.jl
SolverBenchmark.jl
SolverTools.jl

@tmigot tmigot merged commit e289ac3 into main Jul 7, 2023
@tmigot tmigot deleted the track-bug branch July 7, 2023 02:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant