Skip to content

Conversation

tmigot
Copy link
Member

@tmigot tmigot commented May 17, 2022

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #57 (14dea5a) into main (b2c1615) will increase coverage by 0.86%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #57      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.40%   96.26%   +0.86%     
==========================================
  Files           6        6              
  Lines         761      804      +43     
==========================================
+ Hits          726      774      +48     
+ Misses         35       30       -5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/feasibility-form-nls.jl 99.62% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
src/slack-model.jl 93.31% <0.00%> (+1.23%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b2c1615...14dea5a. Read the comment docs.

@tmigot tmigot marked this pull request as draft May 17, 2022 13:03
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Package name latest stable
ADNLPModels.jl
AmplNLReader.jl
CUTEst.jl
CaNNOLeS.jl
DCI.jl
JSOSolvers.jl
LLSModels.jl
NLPModelsIpopt.jl
NLPModelsJuMP.jl
NLPModelsTest.jl
Percival.jl
QuadraticModels.jl
SolverBenchmark.jl
SolverTools.jl

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Package name latest stable
ADNLPModels.jl
AmplNLReader.jl
CUTEst.jl
CaNNOLeS.jl
DCI.jl
JSOSolvers.jl
LLSModels.jl
NLPModelsIpopt.jl
NLPModelsJuMP.jl
NLPModelsTest.jl
Percival.jl
QuadraticModels.jl
SolverBenchmark.jl
SolverTools.jl

@tmigot
Copy link
Member Author

tmigot commented May 24, 2022

I realized there were some tests missing for the linear API, and then some issues in the current implementation. Since, it is quite a large PR here is a recap':

@tmigot
Copy link
Member Author

tmigot commented May 24, 2022

The breaking packages are the one, where the linear API is not implemented.

@tmigot tmigot marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2022 17:50
@tmigot tmigot requested a review from abelsiqueira May 24, 2022 17:50
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 3, 2022

Package name latest stable
ADNLPModels.jl
AmplNLReader.jl
CUTEst.jl
CaNNOLeS.jl
DCI.jl
JSOSolvers.jl
LLSModels.jl
NLPModelsIpopt.jl
NLPModelsJuMP.jl
NLPModelsTest.jl
Percival.jl
QuadraticModels.jl
SolverBenchmark.jl
SolverTools.jl

Copy link
Member

@abelsiqueira abelsiqueira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I made a small suggestion, but that is not blocking. Thanks for the PR.

tmigot added 3 commits June 6, 2022 14:21
add linear example and fixes

add counters

debug slack

encapsulate in a function
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2022

Package name latest stable
ADNLPModels.jl
AmplNLReader.jl
CUTEst.jl
CaNNOLeS.jl
DCI.jl
JSOSolvers.jl
LLSModels.jl
NLPModelsIpopt.jl
NLPModelsJuMP.jl
NLPModelsTest.jl
Percival.jl
QuadraticModels.jl
SolverBenchmark.jl
SolverTools.jl

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2022

Package name latest stable
ADNLPModels.jl
AmplNLReader.jl
CUTEst.jl
CaNNOLeS.jl
DCI.jl
JSOSolvers.jl
LLSModels.jl
NLPModelsIpopt.jl
NLPModelsJuMP.jl
NLPModelsTest.jl
Percival.jl
QuadraticModels.jl
SolverBenchmark.jl
SolverTools.jl

@probot-auto-merge probot-auto-merge bot merged commit f78ea16 into main Jun 6, 2022
@probot-auto-merge probot-auto-merge bot deleted the feasnls-linear branch June 6, 2022 13:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants