-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Learning Gmsh Geometry Inspection
github-actions[bot] edited this page Jun 23, 2026
·
2 revisions
Beginner to advanced.
Geometry users, mesh-generation learners, and developers studying adapter behavior.
By the end, you can:
- inspect a Gmsh
.geofile; - describe what geometry evidence CaeReflex can extract;
- avoid treating geometry inspection as mesh or design validation; and
- connect adapter output to the ReflexCase model.
examples/gmsh_minimal/t1.geo- Architecture: Adapters
- Developer Guide: Adding Adapters
caereflex inspect-gmsh examples/gmsh_minimal/t1.geo --out gmsh_case.json
caereflex export markdown gmsh_case.json --out gmsh_report.mdReview the report:
sed -n '1,140p' gmsh_report.md- The input is a geometry script, not a completed engineering validation package.
- CaeReflex can record file evidence, detected format, and adapter findings.
- Any downstream mesh adequacy or physical suitability claim requires independent engineering review.
Identify the inspected source file, detected format, and generated output file.
Explain which facts came from the .geo file and which statements would be unsafe to infer.
Read the Gmsh adapter and answer:
- Which fields are extracted directly?
- Which limitations should appear in the report or agent context?
- How would optional Gmsh SDK support change inspection without breaking base imports?
- The learner inspected the Gmsh example.
- The learner can describe geometry evidence without claiming mesh adequacy.
- The learner identifies where adapter responsibilities end.
- Home
- Architecture
- Developer-Guide
- Learning
- Reference
- Releases
- User-Guide
Synced from /wiki/docs in the main CaeReflex repository.