Skip to content

Conversation

@vbrodsky
Copy link
Contributor

@vbrodsky vbrodsky force-pushed the VB/conversational-annotation_AL-5107_2 branch 5 times, most recently from 7ba4a76 to 0d0a967 Compare March 15, 2023 00:36
Copy link
Contributor

@kkim-labelbox kkim-labelbox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some comments. Also, I see that DocumentEntity has a name field, which doesn't seem necessary, since ObjectAnnotation already has a name tied to it. Could you make that change in this PR as well? Will probably need to update the tests as well

def test_conversation_entity(client, configured_project_without_data_rows,
dataset_conversation_entity, rand_gen):

conversation_entity_annotation = ConversationEntity(name="named-entity",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't think you need name here, since the name is set in ObjectAnnotation

@vbrodsky vbrodsky force-pushed the VB/conversational-annotation_AL-5107_2 branch 2 times, most recently from 86a60dd to 3f3a7a1 Compare March 15, 2023 16:59
@vbrodsky vbrodsky force-pushed the VB/conversational-annotation_AL-5107_2 branch 2 times, most recently from 45991f5 to 85a3612 Compare March 15, 2023 18:14
@vbrodsky vbrodsky force-pushed the VB/conversational-annotation_AL-5107_2 branch from 85a3612 to 3527c81 Compare March 15, 2023 18:34
Copy link
Contributor

@kkim-labelbox kkim-labelbox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@vbrodsky vbrodsky merged commit 8c14b63 into develop Mar 15, 2023
@vbrodsky vbrodsky deleted the VB/conversational-annotation_AL-5107_2 branch March 15, 2023 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants