Added claude reviewer

Author: ximihoque

.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml

@@ -1,73 +1,42 @@
-name: Claude Code Review
-
+name: Claude Auto Review
 on:
-  issue_comment:
-    types: [created]
+  pull_request:
+    types: [opened, synchronize]
 
 jobs:
-  claude-review:
-    # Only run when @claude is mentioned in a PR comment
-    if: |
-      github.event.issue.pull_request &&
-      contains(github.event.comment.body, '@claude')
-
+  review:
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
     permissions:
       contents: read
-      pull-requests: read
-      issues: read
+      pull-requests: write
       id-token: write
-
     steps:
-      - name: Checkout repository
-        uses: actions/checkout@v4
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
         with:
-          token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-          repository: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name }}
-          ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }}
-          fetch-depth: 0
+          fetch-depth: 1
 
-      - name: Run Claude Code Review
-        id: claude-review
-        uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@beta
+      - uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@v1
         with:
           anthropic_api_key: ${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }}
+          prompt: |
+            REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
+            PR NUMBER: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
 
-          # Optional: Specify model (defaults to Claude Sonnet 4, uncomment for Claude Opus 4)
-          # model: "claude-opus-4-20250514"
-
-          # Direct prompt for manual review (triggered by @claude mention)
-          direct_prompt: |
-            Please review this pull request and provide feedback on:
+            Please review this pull request with a focus on:
             - Code quality and best practices
             - Logical issues
             - Potential bugs or issues
             - Performance considerations and optimization
             - Security concerns
             - Test coverage
             - Code repeatability
-            - Over engineering
-
-            Be constructive and helpful in your feedback.
-
-          # Optional: Customize review based on file types
-          # direct_prompt: |
-          #   Review this PR focusing on:
-          #   - For TypeScript files: Type safety and proper interface usage
-          #   - For API endpoints: Security, input validation, and error handling
-          #   - For React components: Performance, accessibility, and best practices
-          #   - For tests: Coverage, edge cases, and test quality
+            - Over engineering  
 
-          # Optional: Different prompts for different authors
-          # direct_prompt: |
-          #   ${{ github.event.pull_request.author_association == 'FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR' &&
-          #   'Welcome! Please review this PR from a first-time contributor. Be encouraging and provide detailed explanations for any suggestions.' ||
-          #   'Please provide a thorough code review focusing on our coding standards and best practices.' }}
+            Note: The PR branch is already checked out in the current working directory.
 
-          # Optional: Add specific tools for running tests or linting
-          # allowed_tools: "Bash(npm run test),Bash(npm run lint),Bash(npm run typecheck)"
+            Use `gh pr comment` for top-level feedback.
+            Use `mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment` to highlight specific code issues.
+            Only post GitHub comments - don't submit review text as messages.
 
-          # Optional: Skip review for certain conditions
-          # if: |
-          #   !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[skip-review]') &&
-          #   !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[WIP]')
+          claude_args: |
+            --allowedTools "mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment,Bash(gh pr comment:*),Bash(gh pr diff:*),Bash(gh pr view:*)"