Skip to content

Conversation

@robTheBuildr
Copy link
Collaborator

@robTheBuildr robTheBuildr commented Oct 6, 2025

Before submitting
  • Was this discussed/agreed via a Github issue? (no need for typos and docs improvements)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure to update the docs?
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

What does this PR do?

Users will not see print statements that should be hidden behind a _DEBUG flag.

Fixes # (issue).

Some debugging info made it into this PR

PR review

Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed.
If we didn't discuss your PR in GitHub issues there's a high chance it will not be merged.

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 6, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84%. Comparing base (695a314) to head (3d97a1e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@         Coverage Diff         @@
##           main   #730   +/-   ##
===================================
- Coverage    84%    84%   -0%     
===================================
  Files        52     52           
  Lines      7328   7330    +2     
===================================
- Hits       6122   6121    -1     
- Misses     1206   1209    +3     
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@robTheBuildr robTheBuildr enabled auto-merge (squash) October 6, 2025 21:42
@robTheBuildr robTheBuildr merged commit 87211d5 into main Oct 6, 2025
36 checks passed
@robTheBuildr robTheBuildr deleted the roblevy/hide-print-statement-behind-debug branch October 6, 2025 21:56
@robTheBuildr robTheBuildr mentioned this pull request Oct 6, 2025
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants