Skip to content

Conversation

@Felonious-Spellfire
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Added content about encrypted secrets.

#14612

Does your PR introduce any breaking changes? If yes, please list them.

None

Before submitting

  • Was this discussed/approved via a GitHub issue? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you read the contributor guideline, Pull Request section?
  • Did you make sure your PR does only one thing, instead of bundling different changes together?
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes? (if necessary)
  • Did you write any new necessary tests? (not for typos and docs)
  • Did you verify new and existing tests pass locally with your changes?
  • Did you list all the breaking changes introduced by this pull request?
  • Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or minor internal changes/refactors)

PR review

Anyone in the community is welcome to review the PR.
Before you start reviewing, make sure you have read the review guidelines. In short, see the following bullet-list:

  • Is this pull request ready for review? (if not, please submit in draft mode)
  • Check that all items from Before submitting are resolved
  • Make sure the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR
  • Add labels and milestones (and optionally projects) to the PR so it can be classified

Did you have fun?

Make sure you had fun coding 🙃

@github-actions github-actions bot added the app (removed) Generic label for Lightning App package label Sep 12, 2022
@Felonious-Spellfire Felonious-Spellfire added the docs Documentation related label Sep 12, 2022
@alecmerdler
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of the docs added in #14612

@Felonious-Spellfire Felonious-Spellfire deleted the Docs_encrypted_secrets branch September 12, 2022 22:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

app (removed) Generic label for Lightning App package docs Documentation related

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants