feat: Implement initial ChainReport API schema #90
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@klingonaston has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 32 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughA new JSON Schema file is introduced at Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/app/schema/report_schema.json (3)
14-16: Add enum constraints for bounded value fields.Several fields have specific allowed values described in property descriptions but not enforced as schema constraints. This allows invalid values to pass validation.
- Line 15:
status→ should use"enum": ["completed", "pending", "failed"]- Line 57:
overallSentiment→ should use"enum": ["positive", "neutral", "negative"]- Lines 107-109:
severity→ should use"enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"]Enforcing these at the schema level ensures data integrity and prevents invalid values from entering the system.
Apply this diff to add enum constraints:
- "status": { "type": "string", "description": "Current status of the report (e.g., 'completed', 'pending', 'failed')." } + "status": { "type": "string", "enum": ["completed", "pending", "failed"], "description": "Current status of the report (e.g., 'completed', 'pending', 'failed')." }- "overallSentiment": { "type": "string", "description": "Overall sentiment (e.g., 'positive', 'neutral', 'negative')." }, + "overallSentiment": { "type": "string", "enum": ["positive", "neutral", "negative"], "description": "Overall sentiment (e.g., 'positive', 'neutral', 'negative')." },- "severity": { "type": "string", "description": "Severity of the finding (e.g., 'critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low')." }, + "severity": { "type": "string", "enum": ["critical", "high", "medium", "low"], "description": "Severity of the finding (e.g., 'critical', 'high', 'medium', 'low')." },Also applies to: 57-58, 107-109
24-25: Add minimum constraints on numeric fields.Numeric fields like supply counts, transaction volumes, and scores lack constraints. Non-negative enforcement prevents invalid data (e.g., negative supply or transaction count).
Consider adding
"minimum": 0to these number fields:
- Line 24:
totalSupply- Line 25:
circulatingSupply- Line 46:
transactions- Line 47:
activeAddresses- Line 48:
dailyVolume- Line 49:
smartContractInteractions- Line 78:
teamSize- Line 58:
sentimentScore(may range -1 to 1 or 0 to 100 depending on implementation — consider appropriate bounds)- Line 115:
overallScoreExample diff for
totalSupply:- "totalSupply": { "type": "number", "description": "Total supply of the token." }, + "totalSupply": { "type": "number", "minimum": 0, "description": "Total supply of the token." },Apply similar changes to the other numeric fields listed above.
Also applies to: 46-49, 78-78, 115-115
26-37: Consider adding minItems constraint for arrays.Several array fields likely require at least one element for meaningful data:
- Line 26:
distribution— token distribution should have at least one category- Line 59:
sourceBreakdown— sentiment breakdown should have at least one source- Line 80:
keyMembers— team should have at least one key member listed- Line 102:
findings— code audit should document at least one findingAdding
"minItems": 1enforces data completeness and prevents empty arrays that might break frontend rendering or analysis logic.Example diff for
distribution:"distribution": { "type": "array", + "minItems": 1, "items": {Apply similar changes to
sourceBreakdown,keyMembers, andfindingsarrays.Also applies to: 59-70, 80-92, 102-114
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
backend/app/schema/report_schema.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/app/schema/report_schema.json (1)
1-152: Schema structure is well-organized and aligns with PR objectives.The schema correctly defines the complete ChainReport response structure with clear property descriptions, appropriate nesting, and strict validation via
additionalProperties: false. The 8 top-level sections (metadata, tokenomics, onchainData, sentiment, teamAnalysis, codeAudit, documentationReview, summary) are all properly required, and nested objects are well-structured for TypeScript interface compatibility.
|
the schema setup for |
Overview: Adds a new JSON schema for ChainReport API responses, aligning with frontend data structures.
Changes
report_schema.jsonunderbackend/app/src/schema(intended location).metadata,tokenomics,onchainData,sentiment,teamAnalysis,codeAudit,documentationReview, andsummary.Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.