Azure Table Storage implementation of ISessionStore: first-party or community package? #4867
joshhanson314
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
I think it is a fine idea to add it to the repo - it would be a new nuget package that people can opt into correct? Does it have integration into the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I added the
ISessionStoreabstraction in #4832 (issue #4565), shipped in 10.1. I have an Azure Table Storage implementation of it that's been running in production for a while, backing Blazor server<->WASM state flow through theStateController, and I'd like to contribute it back as the first concreteISessionStoreprovider. Ideally as first-party rather than a community package, given the precedent for provider packages with third-party deps already in the repo (Csla.Channels.RabbitMq,Csla.Channels.Grpc,Csla.Data.SqlClient).The question: would you want this as a first-party package in the repo (e.g.
Csla.Blazor.State.AzureTableStorage), or would you rather it live as a community package that you link from the docs?Happy to go whichever way you prefer. Just let me know and I'll open the PR (or publish and send a docs link).
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions