Skip to content

Conversation

@forki
Copy link
Contributor

@forki forki commented May 3, 2016

@dsyme for #1143 we run into a missing pattern match (see diff). I copied the match case from the outer pattern match and the compile error is gone. I'm not sure if this is the correct fix...

/cc @swlaschin

UPDATE: @dsyme suggested a better fix. PR updated

@forki forki changed the title Don't fail with "impossible" compile error - fixes #1144 Don't fail with "impossible" compile error - fixes #1143 May 3, 2016
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this should just be stripTyEqnsAndMeasureEqns here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok let me check if it fixes it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep that works. PR updated

@dsyme
Copy link
Contributor

dsyme commented May 3, 2016

This looks good to me, the fix is very appropriate - we should always have been stripping units of measure here.

I wonder if we can add a test. I know the original repro is complex though.

@KevinRansom KevinRansom merged commit d8802c8 into dotnet:master May 3, 2016
@forki forki deleted the xmldoc branch May 4, 2016 06:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants