(GH-10385) Indicate Path accepts wildcards for Convert-Path

[michaeltlombardi]

PR Summary

Prior to this change, the Path parameter for the Convert-Path cmdlet indicated that it does not accept wildcard values, even though it does.

This change:

• Updates the metadata to accurately reflect the cmdlet behavior
• Fixes AB#156610
• Resolves the -Path parameter for Convert-Path does support wildcards #10385

PR Checklist

• Descriptive Title: This PR's title is a synopsis of the changes it proposes.
• Summary: This PR's summary describes the scope and intent of the change.
• Contributor's Guide: I have read the contributors guide.
• Style: This PR adheres to the style guide.

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit eec6c98:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
reference/5.1/Microsoft.PowerShell.Management/Convert-Path.md	✅Succeeded	View (powershell-5.1)
reference/7.2/Microsoft.PowerShell.Management/Convert-Path.md	✅Succeeded	View (powershell-7.2)
reference/7.3/Microsoft.PowerShell.Management/Convert-Path.md	✅Succeeded	View (powershell-7.3)
reference/7.4/Microsoft.PowerShell.Management/Convert-Path.md	✅Succeeded	View (powershell-7.4)

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Learn support channel

[JamesDBartlett3]

@michaeltlombardi, I was perusing the latest commits, and I could not help noticing all of the places where two-word phrases were replaced with one-word contractions (e.g. they are replaced with they're, it is replaced with it's, etc.). Contractions are generally considered inappropriate in formal writing, but I am not sure whether technical documentation is considered "formal writing" or not, so that particular concern may not apply here. This is mostly a matter of curiosity on my part, so please do not take offense; I am just wondering: Were these changes made in accordance with a style guide, or perhaps made automatically by a quirky English grammar linter of some kind?

[sdwheeler]

@michaeltlombardi, I was perusing the latest commits, and I could not help noticing all of the places where two-word phrases were replaced with one-word contractions

See https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/style-guide/word-choice/use-contractions

[JamesDBartlett3]

Ah, I figured it was probably deliberate. This is good to know! Thanks for pointing me in the right direction, @sdwheeler. 😊