Deprecated fields are not visible in Graphiql

[pjungels-paraport]

Greetings!

I'm relatively new to GraphQL and the DGS framework, so I might be doing something wrong here. Anyway, I am trying to deprecate some fields in our schema using the @deprecated(reason: "reason") directive. When I add the directive, the deprecated fields are no longer visible in GraphiQL and if I try to use the deprecated field in a query I get this error message: "Field is not defined by type . Did you mean <other field name 1> or <other field name 2>?"

Do I need to do something special to see/use deprecated fields?

FYI - here are the relevant items from my build.gradle.kts:
plugins {
...
id("com.netflix.dgs.codegen") version "5.7.1"
id("org.springframework.boot") version "3.0.6"
}

dependencies {
...
implementation(platform("com.netflix.graphql.dgs:graphql-dgs-platform-dependencies:6.0.3"))
implementation("com.netflix.graphql.dgs:graphql-dgs-extended-scalars")
implementation("com.netflix.graphql.dgs:graphql-dgs-spring-boot-starter")
implementation("com.netflix.graphql.dgs:graphql-dgs-pagination")
...
}

Thanks!
Paul

[srinivasankavitha]

We don't own this in the framework. We simply use this : https://www.npmjs.com/package/graphiql
Generally deprecated fields are not meant to be discoverable, but they should show up with a warning that the field is deprecated. I see that behavior in the example I just tested.

[pjungels-paraport]

@srinivasankavitha , regarding this statement: "Generally deprecated fields are not meant to be discoverable, but they should show up with a warning that the field is deprecated." That's exactly what I was expecting. However, the fields aren't even showing up for me. Here's a quick example:

Schema snippet:

type Query {
    securities(
        masterSecurityIds: [Int!]!,
        enhanced: Boolean = false @deprecated(reason: "some reason")
    ): [Security]
}

Screenshot from GraphiQL showing the "enhanced" argument isn't available anywhere:

Do I need to do something specific so they are visible in the UI (with the expected warning)?

[srinivasankavitha]

Not that I am aware of. When I tried it , I was able to view it just fine and I don't have any special configuration.