update

[planetabhi]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Bumped @new-ui/foundations version from 0.2.5 to 0.2.6.
  • Ensures package metadata is current for publishing and dependency management.
  • No changes to features, UI, performance, or APIs.
  • No user action required beyond updating the dependency if desired.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The package version in package.json was incremented from 0.2.5 to 0.2.6 for @new-ui/foundations. No other files or properties were changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Version bump package.json	Updated "version" from "0.2.5" to "0.2.6" for @new-ui/foundations.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my nose at version tags,
From .5 to .6, no extra lags.
A hop, a bump, a tidy fix,
Release it quick—no code to mix.
Carrots count the semver clicks.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The PR title "update" is too vague to clearly describe the main change; the changeset shows a single version bump in package.json ( @new-ui/foundations from 0.2.5 to 0.2.6 ), so the title does not meaningfully summarize the primary change for reviewers scanning history. Because the title is generic rather than descriptive, the check is inconclusive.	Rename the PR to a concise, descriptive title such as "chore: bump @new-ui/foundations to 0.2.6" or "Bump @new-ui/foundations 0.2.5 → 0.2.6" and ensure the description notes the version change; this makes the intent clear for reviewers and for repository history. If there are additional changes beyond the version bump, include them in the title or description so the title accurately reflects the main change.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 204564f and f4ebf5a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• package.json (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

package.json (1)

3-3: Version bump to 0.2.6 — verified; release tasks remain

• Confirmed: package.json version is "0.2.6" and the latest commit on branch coderabbit_9 changes only package.json.
• npm pack --dry-run shows @new-ui/foundations@0.2.6 will pack dist/, src/, README.md, LICENSE.
• No CHANGELOG entry found for 0.2.6 — add/update CHANGELOG with release notes.
• package.json has no publishConfig; because the package is scoped (@new-ui/foundations), add "publishConfig": { "access": "public" } to package.json or run npm publish --access public.
• After merge: tag v0.2.6 and create the GitHub release; coordinate dependent bumps if consumers pin exact versions.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}