Skip to content

Network data sources

Jip Claassens edited this page Aug 3, 2026 · 3 revisions

Network data sources

Every accessibility study starts with a decision about network data. The choice constrains which modes can be modelled, which areas can be covered, and how much cleaning work follows.

Comparison

Source Coverage Modes Licence Main limitation
OSM Global Car, bicycle, pedestrian, (rail) ODbL Variable completeness and tagging quality
NWB Netherlands Car, cycle/footpaths as separate file Open National only; cross-border routes not represented
GTFS Per transit operator/region Public transport Varies Timetables only; no infrastructure geometry
Commercial (TomTom, HERE) Global Car Proprietary Cost; but includes speed profiles by time of day

Sources are routinely combined: OSM geometry for cycling and walking, a commercial source for car speed profiles reflecting congestion, and GTFS for transit. The Dutch national network model does exactly this — see the network model documentation.

What to check before committing to a source

  1. Modes. Does it contain cycle and foot paths, or only roads a car can use? A car-only file makes pedestrian accessibility impossible, not merely approximate.
  2. Extent and edges. Does it cover the area around your study area? Many fastest routes within the Netherlands run through Belgium or Germany, and a national-only file will route them the long way. See Zoning and spatial units on edge effects.
  3. Directionality and restrictions. One-way flags, turn restrictions, access tags (private roads, bus lanes, pedestrian zones).
  4. Connectivity. Whether links that cross actually share a node — see Building a routable network. Bridges and tunnels must not connect.
  5. Attributes for speed. Road classification, speed limits, surface — the inputs to Travel speeds per mode.
  6. Update frequency and versioning. A reproducible study needs a dated snapshot, not "current".

Related

Clone this wiki locally