Added rdd header files to the artifact

[grandsuri]

No description provided.

[velomatt]

Please pull changes from master. This branch does not have up-to-date CI/CD.

[grandsuri]

FYI
The file dss_sdk/host/src/openmpdk/PDK/core/src/api/include/rdd_cl.h is split into two files dss_sdk/utils/include/rdd_cl_api.h and dss_sdk/utils/rdd_cl/rdd_cl.h. We need either the first file or the latter 2 files to compile client code.

Since the first file is in openmpdk repo, I just went with the 2 files in dss_sdk repo and added those 2 files to Makefile to copy into nkv-sdk-bin tar ball artifact.

[velomatt]

Looks okay to me. I've confirmed these artifacts now appear in include in the artifact subdirectory for nkv-sdk-bin

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

[velomatt]

Contents of host_out post-build:

bash-4.2$ find host_out/ -name "*rdd*"
host_out/lib/librdd_cl.so
host_out/utils/rdd_cl
host_out/utils/rdd_cl/CMakeFiles/rdd_cl.dir
host_out/utils/rdd_cl/CMakeFiles/rdd_cl.dir/rdd_cl.c.d
host_out/utils/rdd_cl/CMakeFiles/rdd_cl.dir/rdd_cl.c.o
host_out/include/rdd_cl_api.h
host_out/include/rdd_cl.h

Contents of nkv-sdk-bin tarball:

bash-4.2$ find nkv-sdk -name "*rdd*"
nkv-sdk/include/rdd_cl_api.h
nkv-sdk/include/rdd_cl.h
nkv-sdk/lib/librdd_cl.so
nkv-sdk/conf/nkv_config_rdd.json

Assuming this is the expected behavior, I approve

[velomatt]

Approved - per my comments above

[grandsuri]

Contents of host_out post-build:

bash-4.2$ find host_out/ -name "*rdd*"
host_out/lib/librdd_cl.so
host_out/utils/rdd_cl
host_out/utils/rdd_cl/CMakeFiles/rdd_cl.dir
host_out/utils/rdd_cl/CMakeFiles/rdd_cl.dir/rdd_cl.c.d
host_out/utils/rdd_cl/CMakeFiles/rdd_cl.dir/rdd_cl.c.o
host_out/include/rdd_cl_api.h
host_out/include/rdd_cl.h

Contents of nkv-sdk-bin tarball:

bash-4.2$ find nkv-sdk -name "*rdd*"
nkv-sdk/include/rdd_cl_api.h
nkv-sdk/include/rdd_cl.h
nkv-sdk/lib/librdd_cl.so
nkv-sdk/conf/nkv_config_rdd.json

Assuming this is the expected behavior, I approve

Yes