Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi,

We had a little internal discussion about it, the better way would be to use Sep 2038 instead of Aug 2038 for Jan 2300 to concatenate the monthly data, see figure. However, this can still result in differences of about 0.5 W/m^2 in the TSI when compared to monthly averaging the extended daily data.

Please note that I am not aware of a future calendar change and proleptic_gregorian will probably be used for a while and there should be no confusion in that regard. Thus producing the monthly-averaged data from the daily series is straightforward, setting the time coordinate to the 15 of each month. However, to avoid any confusion, we have produced an extended data set for those who are i…

Replies: 3 comments 7 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
3 replies
@victoriarspada
Comment options

@znichollscr
Comment options

@znichollscr
Comment options

Answer selected by znichollscr
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
4 replies
@mdeushimri
Comment options

@st-bender
Comment options

@st-bender
Comment options

@mdeushimri
Comment options

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
4 participants