Repository navigation
How should monthly SOLARIS-HEPPA solar forcing be extended beyond 2299? #475
|
We would appreciate clarification on how to extend the monthly SOLARIS-HEPPA solar forcing beyond 31 December 2299 for the (esm-)scen7-x-ext experiment. The current guidance specifies that the forcing should be repeated from 24 August 2038, with 1 January 2300 corresponding to 24 August 2038. However, our atmospheric chemistry model uses a proleptic Gregorian calendar and accepts only the officially provided monthly SSI data, which are used to calculate photolysis rates. Because the repetition begins in the middle of a month, the specified daily mapping cannot be reproduced exactly using the provided calendar-month means alone. Could you please clarify the formally recommended and CMIP7-compliant procedure for models that use only the provided monthly data? We would prefer not to generate new monthly data from the daily dataset, as the averaging and calendar-mapping procedure could introduce arbitrary methodological choices. Our preference is therefore to use the officially a provided monthly dataset without additional temporal aggregation. In this case, should January 2300 use the August 2038 monthly value, followed sequentially by September 2038 for February 2300, or is another procedure recommended? |
Replies: 3 comments 7 replies
|
@berndfunke @st-bender could you help here please? Thanks! |
|
Hi, We had a little internal discussion about it, the better way would be to use Sep 2038 instead of Aug 2038 for Jan 2300 to concatenate the monthly data, see figure. However, this can still result in differences of about 0.5 W/m^2 in the TSI when compared to monthly averaging the extended daily data. Please note that I am not aware of a future calendar change and proleptic_gregorian will probably be used for a while and there should be no confusion in that regard. Thus producing the monthly-averaged data from the daily series is straightforward, setting the time coordinate to the 15 of each month. However, to avoid any confusion, we have produced an extended data set for those who are interested: https://cloud.iaa.es/index.php/s/Qej32YyNkrCkBMG @znicholls Feel free to upload this data set along side the standard scenarios. I tried to keep the data and descriptions consistent and updated for 230001-256104, please let me know if I missed something that should be updated to match your consistency criteria.
|
|
Thank you very much for your detailed response and for taking the time to prepare the extended dataset. For our model, we plan to use the extended monthly dataset that you have prepared based on the daily data. We greatly appreciate your support. |

Hi,
We had a little internal discussion about it, the better way would be to use Sep 2038 instead of Aug 2038 for Jan 2300 to concatenate the monthly data, see figure. However, this can still result in differences of about 0.5 W/m^2 in the TSI when compared to monthly averaging the extended daily data.
Please note that I am not aware of a future calendar change and proleptic_gregorian will probably be used for a while and there should be no confusion in that regard. Thus producing the monthly-averaged data from the daily series is straightforward, setting the time coordinate to the 15 of each month. However, to avoid any confusion, we have produced an extended data set for those who are i…