[feature] valueObjects #8
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
druid628
commented
Jan 28, 2025
druid628
commented
Feb 16, 2025
druid628
force-pushed
the
feature/valueObjects
branch
from
f474d17 to
3adcd81
Compare
druid628
force-pushed
the
feature/valueObjects
branch
from
4edfd91 to
f560b27
Compare
|
… rest of project will be fixed in v3 release
druid628
force-pushed
the
feature/valueObjects
branch
from
7f925bd to
20b468a
Compare
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the software engineering world, much of the code here is already functioning like valueObjects from DDD
decided to add a separate "domain" to the project specifically for valueObjects that provides a base collection of common used models"
This is the beginning of that story.
doink doink
Enjoy the ridiculous Law & Order humor here... 🤦🏼♂️