Skip to content

Conversation

davetcoleman
Copy link
Member

This repo was using a bad CI approach and not using our best practices

Copy link
Contributor

@henningkayser henningkayser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, now we have to fix clang-tidy ;)

@davetcoleman
Copy link
Member Author

There are a lot of clang-tidy errors, which I do not have time for :-/
I think this PR will just stay open until someone is able to address this...

@davetcoleman
Copy link
Member Author

I've actually just removed the clang-tidy tests so we can merge this in now...

@davetcoleman davetcoleman mentioned this pull request Aug 20, 2019
Copy link
Member

@nbbrooks nbbrooks left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very cool. The clang tidy cleanup sounds like a great project for Jafer / Guilherme!

@davetcoleman davetcoleman merged commit b454935 into master Aug 20, 2019
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the fix_clang_format_travis branch August 20, 2019 23:44
@davetcoleman
Copy link
Member Author

I've added to JIRA

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants