New Components - teach_n_go #14331
New Components - teach_n_go #14331
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Sources - New Class Created - New Student Registration Actions - Create Prospect - Create Student
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several new modules and functionalities to the Teach 'n Go application. Key additions include actions for creating prospects and students, new constants, utility functions, and a base module for event emission. The modifications also encompass updates to the application's package configuration and the introduction of new methods for handling API requests and pagination. Overall, these changes enhance the application's ability to manage user-related data and events effectively. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
components/teach_n_go/common/constants.mjs (3)
1-1: Consider adding a descriptive comment for the LIMIT constant.While the constant name
LIMITis clear, it would be helpful to add a brief comment explaining its specific purpose and usage in the context of the Teach 'n Go application. This will improve code readability and maintainability.Consider adding a comment like this:
+// Maximum number of items to retrieve per API request export const LIMIT = 100;
3-7: LGTM! Consider adding a descriptive comment for GENDER_OPTIONS.The
GENDER_OPTIONSarray is well-structured and inclusive. To further improve code readability, consider adding a brief comment explaining its purpose and usage in the Teach 'n Go application.Consider adding a comment like this:
+// Available gender options for user profiles in Teach 'n Go export const GENDER_OPTIONS = [ "Female", "Male", "Not Specified", ];
9-30: LGTM! Consider adding a comment and refactoring for improved maintainability.The
PAYMENT_METHOD_OPTIONSarray is well-structured and covers a comprehensive range of payment methods. To further improve code readability and maintainability, consider the following suggestions:
- Add a brief comment explaining its purpose and usage in the Teach 'n Go application.
- Refactor the array to use a more concise object notation for improved readability.
Consider applying the following changes:
+// Available payment method options for transactions in Teach 'n Go export const PAYMENT_METHOD_OPTIONS = [ - { - label: "Cash", - value: 1, - }, - { - label: "Cheque", - value: 2, - }, - { - label: "Credit Card", - value: 3, - }, - { - label: "Bank Transfer", - value: 4, - }, - { - label: "Direct Debit", - value: 5, - }, + { label: "Cash", value: 1 }, + { label: "Cheque", value: 2 }, + { label: "Credit Card", value: 3 }, + { label: "Bank Transfer", value: 4 }, + { label: "Direct Debit", value: 5 }, ];This refactoring maintains the same functionality while improving readability and reducing the number of lines of code.
components/teach_n_go/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-24: LGTM! Consider adding documentation and improving the function name.The
parseObjectfunction is well-implemented and handles various input types correctly. It safely parses JSON strings while preserving non-string values, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity. Good job on including error handling for JSON parsing!Here are a few suggestions to further improve the code:
Add JSDoc comments to clearly describe the function's purpose, parameters, and return value. This will enhance code readability and provide better IDE support.
Consider renaming the function to something more descriptive of its actual functionality, such as
parseJsonValuesorsafeJsonParse. The current name "parseObject" might be slightly misleading as the function handles more than just objects.If possible, consider using TypeScript or adding type checking to improve type safety.
Here's an example of how you could add JSDoc comments and rename the function:
/** * Safely parses JSON strings in the input value or array of values. * Non-string values are returned as-is. * * @param {*} input - The input value or array to parse * @returns {*} Parsed value(s) or the original input if parsing fails */ export const parseJsonValues = (input) => { // ... existing implementation ... };components/teach_n_go/sources/new-class/new-class.mjs (1)
6-11: Specific properties are well-defined, with a minor suggestion for improvement.The properties align well with the PR objectives for creating a new class source. The version, type, and dedupe settings are appropriate for this new component.
Consider enhancing the description to provide more context:
- description: "Emit new event when a class is created.", + description: "Emit new event when a class is created in Teach 'n Go.",This change adds clarity about the specific platform where the event occurs.
components/teach_n_go/sources/new-student/new-student.mjs (4)
4-11: LGTM: Well-structured exported object with a minor suggestion.The exported object is well-structured and includes all necessary properties for the new student registration source. The use of spreading from the
commonobject promotes code reuse.Consider adding a brief comment above the exported object to describe its purpose and any important details about its usage.
14-16: LGTM with a suggestion for improved robustness.The
getFunctionmethod correctly returns a reference to thelistStudentsfunction from the app context, which aligns with the module's purpose.Consider adding a check to ensure
this.app.listStudentsexists before returning it. This would improve the robustness of the code:getFunction() { if (typeof this.app.listStudents !== 'function') { throw new Error('listStudents function is not available in the app context'); } return this.app.listStudents; },
17-23: LGTM with suggestions for improved robustness and clarity.The
getSummarymethod effectively formats the student information into a readable string. The use of template literals and conditional inclusion of the email address is well done.Consider the following improvements:
- Add input validation to handle potential undefined values:
getSummary({ fname = '', lname = '', email_address: email = '', }) { const fullName = [fname, lname].filter(Boolean).join(' ') || 'Unknown'; return `New Student: ${fullName}${email ? ` - ${email}` : ''}`; },
- Use nullish coalescing for email to handle empty strings:
return `New Student: ${fullName}${email ?? '' ? ` - ${email}` : ''}`;These changes will make the method more robust and handle edge cases more gracefully.
25-25: LGTM: Inclusion of sampleEmit is good practice.The inclusion of a
sampleEmitis beneficial for testing and documentation purposes.Consider adding a brief comment above the
sampleEmitproperty to explain its purpose and usage. For example:// Sample event for testing and documentation purposes sampleEmit,components/teach_n_go/sources/new-class/test-event.mjs (2)
1-5: Clarify the usage of "[Online Lesson]" incourse_full_titleThe
course_full_titleincludes "[Online Lesson]", which might not be applicable to all classes. Consider making this dynamic based on the class type or removing it if it's not always relevant.Suggestion:
"course_full_title": `${course_title}${isOnline ? ' [Online Lesson]' : ''}`,Also applies to: 14-14
6-8: Date and time fields look good, consider adding time zone informationThe date and time related fields are well-structured and provide comprehensive information about the course schedule and duration. The use of ISO 8601 date format is appropriate.
Consider adding a
time_zonefield to ensure clarity across different geographical locations, especially for online classes.Also applies to: 24-25, 31-32
components/teach_n_go/sources/new-student/test-event.mjs (3)
1-51: Overall structure looks good, with some suggestions for improvement.The exported object provides a comprehensive representation of a student entity, which is suitable for testing purposes. However, there are a few areas where we can improve code quality and consistency:
Consider using more specific types for certain fields:
- Use
nullinstead of empty strings for unknown values (e.g.,mobile_phone,home_phone,street_name_and_number, etc.).- Use
booleaninstead of strings forcourse_startedandcourse_ended.Ensure consistency in date formats:
registration_dateanddate_of_birthuse "YYYY-MM-DD" format.enrolment_dateuses "YYYY-MM-DD" format as well, which is good.Consider using enums or constants for fields with predefined values:
genderdiscount_typepreferred_payment_methodrecurrencepayment_frequencyThe
custom_fieldsarray is empty. Consider adding a sample custom field for testing purposes.The
photo_linkvalue seems to be a default image path. Consider using a full URL or a more descriptive placeholder.Would you like me to provide a refactored version of this object addressing these points?
34-50: Enhance theclassesarray for more comprehensive testingThe
classesarray provides a good structure for representing a student's enrolled courses. However, to improve its usefulness for testing, consider the following suggestions:
- Add more than one class to the array to test multiple enrollments.
- Provide non-empty values for
course_subject,course_level, andcourse_descriptionto ensure these fields are properly handled.- Consider adding a class with
course_ended: trueto test different scenarios.Here's an example of how you could enhance the
classesarray:"classes": [ { "course_title": "Introduction to Programming", "course_full_title": "Introduction to Programming [Online Lesson]", "course_subject": "Computer Science", "course_level": "Beginner", "course_description": "Learn the basics of programming with Python", "course_started": true, "course_ended": false, "school_id": 16385, "recurrence": "weekly", "payment_frequency": "monthly", "enrolment_date": "2024-10-20", "unenrolment_date": null, "student_id": 411081 }, { "course_title": "Advanced Mathematics", "course_full_title": "Advanced Mathematics [In-Person]", "course_subject": "Mathematics", "course_level": "Advanced", "course_description": "Explore complex mathematical concepts", "course_started": true, "course_ended": true, "school_id": 16385, "recurrence": "twice_weekly", "payment_frequency": "per_lesson", "enrolment_date": "2024-09-01", "unenrolment_date": "2024-12-15", "student_id": 411081 } ]This enhancement would provide a more comprehensive test case for the new student event.
1-51: Summary: Good foundation, with room for enhancementOverall, this test event provides a good foundation for testing the new student source. The structure is comprehensive and covers most aspects of a student entity. However, there are several areas where it could be improved to provide more realistic and comprehensive test data:
- Use more specific types for certain fields (e.g.,
nullinstead of empty strings, booleans instead of strings where appropriate).- Ensure consistency in date formats and use realistic values.
- Consider using enums or constants for fields with predefined values.
- Enhance the
classesarray with multiple entries and more diverse data.- Address the specific issues mentioned in previous comments (e.g., typos, unrealistic values).
These enhancements would make the test event more robust and representative of real-world scenarios, potentially uncovering edge cases or issues that might not be apparent with the current data.
Consider creating a separate configuration file for test data constants (e.g., valid course subjects, levels, payment frequencies) to maintain consistency across different test events and make updates easier in the future.
components/teach_n_go/actions/create-prospect/create-prospect.mjs (1)
59-60: Fix grammatical errors in descriptionsThere are grammatical errors in the descriptions for
courseSubjectandcourseLevel. The word "students" should be possessive, i.e., "student's".Apply this diff to correct the descriptions:
courseSubject: { type: "string", label: "Course Subject", - description: "The students chosen subject.", + description: "The student's chosen subject.", optional: true, }, courseLevel: { type: "string", label: "Course Level", - description: "The students chosen level.", + description: "The student's chosen level.", optional: true, },Also applies to: 65-66
components/teach_n_go/teach_n_go.app.mjs (1)
56-56: Simplify the API key assignment in headersIn the
_headersmethod, you're using a template literal to assign the API key. Sincethis.$auth.api_keyis already a string, the template literal is unnecessary. Simplify the assignment for clarity.Update the line as follows:
return { - "X-API-KEY": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, + "X-API-KEY": this.$auth.api_key, ...headers, };components/teach_n_go/actions/create-student/create-student.mjs (2)
34-39: UsepropDefinitionforregistrationDateto ensure consistencyConsider using
propDefinitionforregistrationDateto maintain consistency with other date fields likedateOfBirth. This promotes reusability and reduces redundant code.Apply this diff to update
registrationDate:- type: "string", - label: "Registration Date", - description: "The student's registration date. **Format: YYYY-MM-DD**", + propDefinition: [ + app, + "registrationDate", + ], optional: true, },
154-159: UsepropDefinitionforenrolmentDateto ensure consistencySimilar to other date fields, using
propDefinitionforenrolmentDateenhances consistency and reusability across the codebase.Apply this diff to update
enrolmentDate:- type: "string", - label: "Enrolment Date", - description: "The date of the student's enrolment.", + propDefinition: [ + app, + "enrolmentDate", + ], optional: true, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- components/teach_n_go/actions/create-prospect/create-prospect.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/actions/create-student/create-student.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/common/constants.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/common/utils.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/package.json (2 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/sources/common/base.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/sources/new-class/new-class.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/sources/new-class/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/sources/new-student/new-student.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/sources/new-student/test-event.mjs (1 hunks)
- components/teach_n_go/teach_n_go.app.mjs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (22)
components/teach_n_go/package.json (4)
3-3: LGTM: Version update follows semantic versioning.The version update from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 is appropriate for adding new features without breaking changes. This aligns well with semantic versioning principles.
12-14: LGTM: PublishConfig correctly set for public access.Setting the access to "public" in publishConfig is appropriate for a package intended to be publicly available on npm. This aligns well with the PR objectives of introducing new components for public use.
Line range hint
1-18: Summary: Package.json updates align well with PR objectives.The changes to package.json, including the version update, addition of dependencies, and publishConfig modification, are consistent with the PR objectives of introducing new Teach 'n Go components. These updates appropriately prepare the package for public release and use of necessary Pipedream platform features.
15-17: Verify the usage of @pipedream/platform dependency.The addition of @pipedream/platform as a dependency is appropriate for the new components. The version constraint (^3.0.3) allows for compatible updates, which is a good practice.
To ensure this dependency is used correctly, please run the following script:
components/teach_n_go/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-30: Overall, well-structured constants file that aligns with PR objectives.This new
constants.mjsfile is well-organized and provides essential constants for the Teach 'n Go application. The constants defined here (LIMIT, GENDER_OPTIONS, and PAYMENT_METHOD_OPTIONS) align well with the PR objectives, particularly for creating prospects and students.The use of a separate constants file promotes code organization, reusability, and maintainability. It will be beneficial for implementing the polling sources and actions mentioned in the PR objectives, such as creating prospects and students.
Great job on setting up this foundation for the new components!
components/teach_n_go/sources/new-class/new-class.mjs (3)
1-2: Imports look good.The imports are appropriate for the module's functionality, importing the common base module and the sample emit function.
4-5: Module export and common properties extension look good.The module is correctly exported as the default export, and it effectively extends the common base module using the spread operator. This approach allows for easy inheritance of properties and methods from the base module while enabling specific customizations.
12-22: Methods and sample emit look good, with suggestions for improvement.The methods align well with the PR objectives for handling new class events. The
getSummarymethod provides a clear summary of the new class event, and includingsampleEmitis good for testing purposes.Please verify the existence and functionality of the
listCoursesmethod in the app object. Run the following script to check for its usage:Consider adding error handling to the
getFunctionmethod:getFunction() { - return this.app.listCourses; + if (typeof this.app.listCourses === 'function') { + return this.app.listCourses; + } else { + throw new Error('listCourses method not found in the app object'); + } },This change ensures that the method exists before returning it and provides a clear error message if it's missing.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
listCoursesmethod exists and functions correctly.The
listCoursesmethod is properly defined and accessible within theappobject innew-class.mjs. All references tolistCoursesacross the codebase have been verified.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of the listCourses method # Test: Search for the listCourses method definition or usage rg --type javascript 'listCourses'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence and usage of the listCourses method # Test: Search for the listCourses method definition or usage using ripgrep with the correct file type rg --type js 'listCourses'Length of output: 26
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Thoroughly verify the existence and usage of the listCourses method # Test 1: Search for 'listCourses' with parentheses to find function definitions or calls rg 'listCourses\(' # Test 2: Search for 'listCourses' without restricting to file type rg 'listCourses'Length of output: 3481
components/teach_n_go/sources/new-student/new-student.mjs (2)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and consistent.The import statements are correctly importing the necessary modules using relative paths, which is consistent with the module structure.
1-26: Overall, well-implemented module aligned with PR objectives.This new module for handling new student registrations is well-structured and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives. It effectively extends the common base module, promoting code reuse, and provides the necessary methods for its functionality.
Key strengths:
- Clear and concise implementation of the new student registration source.
- Proper use of imports and exports.
- Well-defined properties and methods.
While the implementation is solid, consider the suggested improvements for increased robustness, error handling, and documentation to further enhance the module's quality and maintainability.
components/teach_n_go/sources/new-class/test-event.mjs (4)
15-17: Metadata fields are comprehensive, clarifyexception_datesThe metadata and system fields provide good tracking information and seem well-structured.
Could you provide more context about the
exception_datesandremoved_exception_datesfields? What do they represent, and how are they used?#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of exception_dates fields rg --type javascript 'exception_dates|removed_exception_dates' components/teach_n_goAlso applies to: 27-30, 42-45
11-11: Consider documenting miscellaneous fields and their purposesThe miscellaneous fields provide additional context for the class, but their purposes might not be immediately clear to all developers.
- Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose and possible values of fields like
subscription_plan_id,is_stripe_sub_allow, andis_booking_class.- For fields that are frequently null or empty (like
photo,skype_meeting_link), consider using optional chaining or providing default values to prevent potential issues.To ensure consistent usage of these fields across the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usage of specific fields rg --type javascript 'subscription_plan_id|is_stripe_sub_allow|is_booking_class' components/teach_n_goAlso applies to: 22-23, 33-41
9-10: Payment and enrollment fields are consistent, clarifycustom_paymentsThe payment and enrollment related fields are consistent with a free course and provide useful tracking information.
Could you please clarify the purpose and expected values of the
custom_paymentsfield? If it's not used for free courses, consider adding a comment or adjusting the type to reflect this.Also applies to: 12-13, 18-21, 26-26
1-46: Overall, the test event object is well-structured and aligns with PR objectivesThis test event object provides a comprehensive representation of a new class event, which aligns well with the PR objectives of implementing new components for the Teach 'n Go platform. It covers essential aspects such as course details, scheduling, payment information, and system metadata.
The structure is logical and the use of appropriate data types is consistent throughout. This test event will be valuable for testing the "new-class" polling source mentioned in the PR objectives.
To further improve the file:
- Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation, especially for fields with non-obvious purposes.
- Ensure that all fields are necessary and used in the actual implementation of the new-class source.
- Validate that the test event covers all scenarios that the new-class source needs to handle.
To ensure this test event is properly utilized:
components/teach_n_go/sources/common/base.mjs (2)
25-28: Confirm the order of items returned by pagination.The effectiveness of the
emitEventmethod depends on the order of items returned bythis.app.paginate. If the API changes or returns items in ascending order, the logic may not function as intended.Consider verifying the order of items or explicitly sorting them based on
id.
39-39: Verify thatresponseArray[0].idcorresponds to the latest event.When updating the last processed ID:
this._setLastId(responseArray[0].id);Ensure that
responseArray[0]contains the event with the highestid. SinceresponseArraymay be in the order received from the API, confirm that this logic correctly captures the latest event, especially if the API response order changes.Run the following script to verify the ordering of
responseArray:components/teach_n_go/actions/create-prospect/create-prospect.mjs (2)
73-82: Ensure correct mapping of property names to API payloadVerify that the property names in the
dataobject match the API's expected payload fields. For instance, confirm that the API expects"fname"and not"first_name", and so on for other fields.Check the API documentation or use the following script to double-check the field names:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare the property names used in the data payload with those expected by the API. # Expected: All property names should match the API's expected field names. echo "Verifying field names in the data payload:" fields=("fname" "lname" "mobile_phone" "email_address" "description" "gender" "date_of_birth" "course_subject" "course_level") for field in "${fields[@]}"; do echo "Field in payload: $field" done echo "Please confirm these match the API documentation."
74-81: Verify that required fields are correctly specifiedEnsure that all mandatory fields required by the Teach 'n Go API are included and correctly specified. According to the API documentation, certain fields may be required for the
createProspectendpoint.Run the following script to check which fields are required and verify that they are not marked as optional in the action:
✅ Verification successful
All required fields are correctly specified.
The
createProspectaction includes all mandatory fields as per the Teach 'n Go API documentation, and each is appropriately marked as required.
fnamelnamemobile_phoneemail_addresscourse_subjectcourse_level🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify required fields for the createProspect API call. # Test: Check if mandatory fields are correctly set as required in the action props. # Expected: All required fields are not marked as optional. # List of fields in the data object fields=("fname" "lname" "mobile_phone" "email_address" "description" "gender" "date_of_birth" "course_subject" "course_level") for field in "${fields[@]}"; do echo "Checking if $field is required by the API..." done # Suggest reviewing the action props for required fields. echo "Please review the action props to ensure that required fields are correctly specified."Length of output: 1518
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that required fields in action props are correctly specified as required. # Using ast-grep to check the 'createProspect' action props in 'components/teach_n_go/actions/create-prospect/create-prospect.mjs' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $'actionProps: { $$$ fname: { $$$ required: true, $$$ }, lname: { $$$ required: true, $$$ }, mobile_phone: { $$$ required: true, $$$ }, email_address: { $$$ required: true, $$$ }, description: { $$$ required: false, $$$ }, gender: { $$$ required: false, $$$ }, date_of_birth: { $$$ required: false, $$$ }, course_subject: { $$$ required: true, $$$ }, course_level: { $$$ required: true, $$$ }, $$$ }'Length of output: 586
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Individually verify that each required field in action props is correctly specified as required. # List of required fields based on API documentation required_fields=("fname" "lname" "mobile_phone" "email_address" "course_subject" "course_level") # Path to the createProspect action file file_path="components/teach_n_go/actions/create-prospect/create-prospect.mjs" # Function to check if a field is marked as required check_required() { local field=$1 ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern $"${field}: { $$$ required: true $$$ }" "$file_path" > /dev/null if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Field '$field' is correctly marked as required." else echo "Field '$field' is NOT correctly marked as required or is missing." fi } echo "Verifying required fields in action props for createProspect API call:" for field in "${required_fields[@]}"; do check_required "$field" doneLength of output: 2606
components/teach_n_go/teach_n_go.app.mjs (3)
35-35: Confirm the data type of the 'courses' propertyThe
coursesproperty is defined with type"integer[]". Verify that the platform correctly handles arrays of integers for component props. If the platform expects array types differently (e.g., as strings or a specific array type), adjust the definition accordingly.Would you like to review the platform's documentation on handling array properties to ensure compatibility?
97-119:⚠️ Potential issueReview pagination logic in the 'paginate' method
The
paginatemethod assumes that the API provides pagination through anextproperty in the response. Verify that the Teach 'n Go API uses this pagination mechanism. If the API uses a different approach (e.g., ahasMoreflag or offset-based pagination), adjust the logic accordingly.Would you like assistance in updating the pagination logic based on the API's actual pagination implementation?
83-96: Verify the structure of the API responsesMethods like
listCoursesandlistStudentsrely on the API responses containing data in a specific format. Since the_makeRequestmethod now returnsresponse.data, ensure that the API endpoints return an object with the expected properties. For example, in thepaginatemethod, it's important that the API response includes bothdataandnext(for pagination).Run the following script to confirm the structure of the API responses:
Ensure that the API responses align with the expected structure to prevent runtime errors.
components/teach_n_go/actions/create-student/create-student.mjs (1)
61-66: ValidatediscountPercentageto ensure it's a valid numberCurrently,
discountPercentageis accepted as a string and parsed usingparseFloat. Adding validation can prevent potential issues with invalid inputs.Consider adding input validation to ensure
discountPercentageis a valid number:type: "string", label: "Discount Percentage", description: "The discount percentage on the payment amount.", optional: true, + async validate(value) { + const number = parseFloat(value); + if (isNaN(number)) { + throw new Error("Discount Percentage must be a valid number"); + } + }, },
| "identification_number": "123", | ||
| "fname": "Jhon", | ||
| "lname": "Doe", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address potential issues in specific properties
There are a few properties that could be improved for better testing and clarity:
-
identification_number(line 4): The value "123" seems unrealistic. Consider using a more representative value, e.g., "ST12345". -
fname(line 5): The name "Jhon" appears to be a typo. It should probably be "John". -
discount_percentage(line 26): This is currently a string "10". For consistency and to avoid potential type-related issues, consider changing it to a number: 10. -
timezone(line 29): The null value might not be ideal for testing. Consider setting it to a valid timezone, e.g., "UTC" or "America/New_York".
Here's a suggested fix for these properties:
- "identification_number": "123",
- "fname": "Jhon",
+ "identification_number": "ST12345",
+ "fname": "John",
...
- "discount_percentage": "10",
+ "discount_percentage": 10,
...
- "timezone": null,
+ "timezone": "UTC",Also applies to: 26-26, 29-29
| this.$emit(item, { | ||
| id: item.id, | ||
| summary: this.getSummary(item), | ||
| ts: Date.parse(item.created || new Date()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure correct parsing of timestamps when item.created is undefined.
The current line may not handle the absence of item.created as intended:
ts: Date.parse(item.created || new Date()),If item.created is undefined, Date.parse(new Date()) converts a Date object to a string before parsing, which can be error-prone. Consider using Date.now() for the current timestamp.
Apply this diff to improve the timestamp handling:
- ts: Date.parse(item.created || new Date()),
+ ts: item.created ? Date.parse(item.created) : Date.now(),This change ensures that if item.created exists, its parsed value is used; otherwise, the current timestamp is applied.
| if (maxResults && (responseArray.length > maxResults)) { | ||
| responseArray.length = maxResults; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor array truncation for clarity.
Directly setting responseArray.length = maxResults can be unclear and potentially error-prone. Using the slice method improves readability and intent.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
if (responseArray.length) {
if (maxResults && (responseArray.length > maxResults)) {
- responseArray.length = maxResults;
+ responseArray = responseArray.slice(0, maxResults);
}
this._setLastId(responseArray[0].id);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (maxResults && (responseArray.length > maxResults)) { | |
| responseArray.length = maxResults; | |
| } | |
| if (responseArray.length) { | |
| if (maxResults && (responseArray.length > maxResults)) { | |
| responseArray = responseArray.slice(0, maxResults); | |
| } | |
| this._setLastId(responseArray[0].id); | |
| } |
| _getLastId() { | ||
| return this.db.get("lastId") || 0; | ||
| }, | ||
| _setLastId(lastId) { | ||
| this.db.set("lastId", lastId); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Define abstract methods getFunction() and getSummary().
The methods emitEvent() and the pagination logic rely on this.getFunction() and this.getSummary(item), which are not defined within the base class. This will result in runtime errors if these methods are not implemented in the derived classes.
Consider adding placeholder methods that throw descriptive errors to ensure that subclasses implement them:
methods: {
_getLastId() {
return this.db.get("lastId") || 0;
},
_setLastId(lastId) {
this.db.set("lastId", lastId);
},
+ getFunction() {
+ throw new Error("getFunction() must be implemented by the subclass.");
+ },
+ getSummary(item) {
+ throw new Error("getSummary() must be implemented by the subclass.");
+ },
async emitEvent(maxResults = false) {
const lastId = this._getLastId();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| _getLastId() { | |
| return this.db.get("lastId") || 0; | |
| }, | |
| _setLastId(lastId) { | |
| this.db.set("lastId", lastId); | |
| }, | |
| _getLastId() { | |
| return this.db.get("lastId") || 0; | |
| }, | |
| _setLastId(lastId) { | |
| this.db.set("lastId", lastId); | |
| }, | |
| getFunction() { | |
| throw new Error("getFunction() must be implemented by the subclass."); | |
| }, | |
| getSummary(item) { | |
| throw new Error("getSummary() must be implemented by the subclass."); | |
| }, |
| type: "integer", | ||
| label: "Mobile Phone", | ||
| description: "The prospect's contact number.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Change mobilePhone type from integer to string
Phone numbers may include characters like '+', '-', or have leading zeros, which are not supported by the integer type. It's recommended to use type: "string" for mobilePhone to accurately capture the prospect's contact number.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
mobilePhone: {
- type: "integer",
+ type: "string",
label: "Mobile Phone",
description: "The prospect's contact number.",
optional: true,
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| type: "integer", | |
| label: "Mobile Phone", | |
| description: "The prospect's contact number.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| mobilePhone: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Mobile Phone", | |
| description: "The prospect's contact number.", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, |
| firstName: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "firstName", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| lastName: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "lastName", | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| mobilePhone: { | ||
| type: "integer", | ||
| label: "Mobile Phone", | ||
| description: "The prospect's contact number.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| emailAddress: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "emailAddress", | ||
| ], | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| description: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Description", | ||
| description: "General information you wish to capture.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| gender: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "gender", | ||
| ], | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| dateOfBirth: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| app, | ||
| "dateOfBirth", | ||
| ], | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| courseSubject: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Course Subject", | ||
| description: "The students chosen subject.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| courseLevel: { | ||
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Course Level", | ||
| description: "The students chosen level.", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consistency in using propDefinition for property definitions
Some properties like mobilePhone, description, courseSubject, and courseLevel are defined directly, while others use propDefinition. For consistency and maintainability, consider using propDefinition for all properties where possible.
If these properties have common definitions elsewhere in the codebase, you can define them using propDefinition:
mobilePhone: {
- type: "string",
- label: "Mobile Phone",
- description: "The prospect's contact number.",
- optional: true,
+ propDefinition: [
+ app,
+ "mobilePhone",
+ ],
},
description: {
- type: "string",
- label: "Description",
- description: "General information you wish to capture.",
- optional: true,
+ propDefinition: [
+ app,
+ "description",
+ ],
},
courseSubject: {
- type: "string",
- label: "Course Subject",
- description: "The student's chosen subject.",
- optional: true,
+ propDefinition: [
+ app,
+ "courseSubject",
+ ],
},
courseLevel: {
- type: "string",
- label: "Course Level",
- description: "The student's chosen level.",
- optional: true,
+ propDefinition: [
+ app,
+ "courseLevel",
+ ],
},This helps in maintaining consistency and reusability across the codebase.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| async options() { | ||
| const { data } = await this.listCourses(); | ||
|
|
||
| return data.map(({ | ||
| course_full_title: label, id: value, | ||
| }) => ({ | ||
| label, | ||
| value, | ||
| })); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for the API call in the 'courses' property
In the courses property, the options function fetches data using this.listCourses(). If the API call fails or returns an error, it could cause the component to crash or the dropdown to fail loading options. Consider adding error handling to manage potential API errors gracefully.
You can modify the options function to handle exceptions:
async options() {
+ try {
const { data } = await this.listCourses();
return data.map(({
course_full_title: label, id: value,
}) => ({
label,
value,
}));
+ } catch (error) {
+ this.$emit('Error fetching courses', error);
+ return [];
+ }
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| async options() { | |
| const { data } = await this.listCourses(); | |
| return data.map(({ | |
| course_full_title: label, id: value, | |
| }) => ({ | |
| label, | |
| value, | |
| })); | |
| }, | |
| async options() { | |
| try { | |
| const { data } = await this.listCourses(); | |
| return data.map(({ | |
| course_full_title: label, id: value, | |
| }) => ({ | |
| label, | |
| value, | |
| })); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| this.$emit('Error fetching courses', error); | |
| return []; | |
| } | |
| }, |
| _makeRequest({ | ||
| $ = this, path, headers, ...opts | ||
| }) { | ||
| return axios($, { | ||
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | ||
| headers: this._headers(headers), | ||
| ...opts, | ||
| }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consistently return response data in '_makeRequest'
The _makeRequest method currently returns the full response from axios, which includes metadata like headers and status codes. However, in other methods (e.g., listCourses), you're destructuring the response assuming it contains a data property. To ensure consistency and simplify response handling, consider returning response.data directly from _makeRequest.
Modify the _makeRequest method to return only the response data:
async _makeRequest({
$ = this, path, headers, ...opts
}) {
const response = await axios($, {
url: this._baseUrl() + path,
headers: this._headers(headers),
...opts,
});
- return response;
+ return response.data;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| _makeRequest({ | |
| $ = this, path, headers, ...opts | |
| }) { | |
| return axios($, { | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: this._headers(headers), | |
| ...opts, | |
| }); | |
| }, | |
| async _makeRequest({ | |
| $ = this, path, headers, ...opts | |
| }) { | |
| const response = await axios($, { | |
| url: this._baseUrl() + path, | |
| headers: this._headers(headers), | |
| ...opts, | |
| }); | |
| return response.data; | |
| }, |
| type: "string", | ||
| label: "Date Of Birth", | ||
| description: "The prospect's date of birth. **Format: YYYY-MM-DD**", | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use a date picker for the 'dateOfBirth' property
The dateOfBirth property is currently of type "string" with a required format of "YYYY-MM-DD". To enhance user experience and ensure consistent formatting, consider using a date picker component, if supported by the platform.
Modify the property definition to use a date type:
dateOfBirth: {
- type: "string",
+ type: "string",
+ controlType: "date",
label: "Date Of Birth",
description: "The prospect's date of birth.",
},Ensure that the platform supports the controlType: "date" option.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| mobilePhoneCode: { | ||
| type: "integer", | ||
| label: "Mobile Phone Code", | ||
| description: "The region code of the mobile phone. Min length: 2, Max length: 4", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| mobilePhone: { | ||
| type: "integer", | ||
| label: "Mobile Phone", | ||
| description: "The student's mobile phone", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| homePhoneCode: { | ||
| type: "integer", | ||
| label: "Home Phone Code", | ||
| description: "The region code of the home phone. Min length: 2, Max length: 4", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| homePhone: { | ||
| type: "integer", | ||
| label: "Home Phone", | ||
| description: "The student's home phone", | ||
| optional: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider changing phone number fields from integer to string
Phone numbers and phone codes may contain leading zeros and can exceed the maximum safe integer size in JavaScript. Using string type ensures accurate representation and handling of these values.
Apply this diff to change the type of phone number fields to string:
- type: "integer",
+ type: "string",
label: "Mobile Phone Code",
description: "The region code of the mobile phone. Min length: 2, Max length: 4",
optional: true,
},
- type: "integer",
+ type: "string",
label: "Mobile Phone",
description: "The student's mobile phone",
optional: true,
},
- type: "integer",
+ type: "string",
label: "Home Phone Code",
description: "The region code of the home phone. Min length: 2, Max length: 4",
optional: true,
},
- type: "integer",
+ type: "string",
label: "Home Phone",
description: "The student's home phone",
optional: true,
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| mobilePhoneCode: { | |
| type: "integer", | |
| label: "Mobile Phone Code", | |
| description: "The region code of the mobile phone. Min length: 2, Max length: 4", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| mobilePhone: { | |
| type: "integer", | |
| label: "Mobile Phone", | |
| description: "The student's mobile phone", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| homePhoneCode: { | |
| type: "integer", | |
| label: "Home Phone Code", | |
| description: "The region code of the home phone. Min length: 2, Max length: 4", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| homePhone: { | |
| type: "integer", | |
| label: "Home Phone", | |
| description: "The student's home phone", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| mobilePhoneCode: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Mobile Phone Code", | |
| description: "The region code of the mobile phone. Min length: 2, Max length: 4", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| mobilePhone: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Mobile Phone", | |
| description: "The student's mobile phone", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| homePhoneCode: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Home Phone Code", | |
| description: "The region code of the home phone. Min length: 2, Max length: 4", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, | |
| homePhone: { | |
| type: "string", | |
| label: "Home Phone", | |
| description: "The student's home phone", | |
| optional: true, | |
| }, |
|
/approve |
Resolves #14312.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores