New Components - flexisign #14552
New Components - flexisign #14552
Conversation
luancazarine
added
the
ai-assisted
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughA new module has been introduced in the Flexisign application to send signature requests using a specified document template. This module includes an action with properties for template management and integrates utility functions for formatting. The application has been updated to include methods for retrieving templates and sending requests, while the package metadata has been modified to reflect these changes, including an updated version and new dependencies. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Actions - Send Document Using Template
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
components/flexisign/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-4: Consider handling edge cases for better user experience.The function could be improved to handle edge cases like empty strings and multiple consecutive underscores.
Here's a more robust implementation:
-export const snakeCaseToTitleCase = (s) => - s.replace(/^_*(.)|_+(.)/g, (s, c, d) => c - ? c.toUpperCase() - : " " + d.toUpperCase()); +export const snakeCaseToTitleCase = (s) => { + if (s == null || typeof s !== 'string') { + throw new TypeError('Input must be a string'); + } + if (!s.trim()) { + return s; + } + // Replace multiple underscores with a single underscore first + return s.replace(/_+/g, '_') + .replace(/^_*(.)|_+(.)/g, (s, c, d) => c + ? c.toUpperCase() + : " " + d.toUpperCase()); +};components/flexisign/actions/send-document-using-template/send-document-using-template.mjs (2)
4-9: Enhance the component description with more details.While the description includes the basic functionality and documentation link, it would be more helpful to include:
- Required inputs (template ID, recipients)
- Optional parameters (message)
- Expected outcome
Consider updating the description to:
- description: "Sends a signature request to the specified recipients for a document generated from a template. [See the documentation](https://flexisign.io/app/integrations/flexisignapi)", + description: "Generates a document from a template and sends it for signature. Requires template ID and recipient details. Optionally includes a custom message with the signature request. [See the documentation](https://flexisign.io/app/integrations/flexisignapi)",
20-52: Improve maintainability of excluded keys.The excluded keys array should be defined as a constant at the top of the file for better maintainability and reusability.
+const EXCLUDED_TEMPLATE_KEYS = ["templateId", "recipientsCount"]; export default { // ... existing code ... async additionalProps() { // ... existing code ... - if (["templateId", "recipientsCount"].includes(key)) continue; + if (EXCLUDED_TEMPLATE_KEYS.includes(key)) continue;components/flexisign/flexisign.app.mjs (4)
28-28: Simplify the API key header assignmentIt's unnecessary to use a template literal when assigning a single variable. You can directly assign
this.$auth.api_keyto the"api-key"header.Apply this diff to simplify the code:
return { - "api-key": `${this.$auth.api_key}`, + "api-key": this.$auth.api_key, };
31-39: Add error handling in_makeRequest()functionCurrently, the
_makeRequest()function does not handle errors that may occur during the HTTP request. Implementing error handling will improve reliability and ease debugging.Consider wrapping the Axios call in a try-catch block:
_makeRequest({ $ = this, path, ...opts }) { - return axios($, { + try { + return axios($, { url: this._baseUrl() + path, headers: this._headers(), ...opts, - }); + }); + } catch (error) { + this.$emit("Error making request", error); + throw error; + } },
12-19: Handle potential errors when retrieving template optionsIn the
options()method fortemplateId, there should be error handling in casethis.listTemplates()fails or returns unexpected data.Consider adding error handling:
async options() { - const { data: { list } } = await this.listTemplates(); + let list; + try { + const { data } = await this.listTemplates(); + list = data.list || []; + } catch (error) { + this.$emit("Error fetching templates", error); + list = []; + } return list.map(({ _id: value, name: label, }) => ({ label, value, })); },
35-35: Use URL concatenation carefully to avoid errorsConcatenating URLs using
+might lead to errors if there are missing or extra slashes. Consider using a template literal or URL constructor to construct request URLs safely.Apply this diff:
- url: this._baseUrl() + path, + url: `${this._baseUrl()}${path}`,Ensure that
this._baseUrl()returns a string that ends with a slash or thatpathbegins with one to prevent URL misformation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
components/flexisign/actions/send-document-using-template/send-document-using-template.mjs(1 hunks)components/flexisign/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/flexisign/flexisign.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/flexisign/package.json(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/flexisign/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-4: LGTM! The regex implementation is correct.
The regular expression effectively handles the conversion from snake_case to Title Case, including cases with leading underscores.
components/flexisign/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM! Version bump follows semver.
The version increment from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new features for the Flexisign integration.
15-17: Verify @pipedream/platform compatibility.
The dependency on @pipedream/platform is correctly specified. However, let's verify that version 3.0.3 includes all required features for the Flexisign integration.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the comprehensive scan of @pipedream/platform versions across components, I can generate the final response:
@pipedream/platform version 3.0.3 is compatible and follows the current versioning pattern
The version 3.0.3 of @pipedream/platform specified in the Flexisign component's package.json is consistent with other recently updated components. Several other components are also using version 3.x.x, including:
- liveswitch (3.0.3)
- rapid_url_indexer (3.0.3)
- tess_ai_by_pareto (3.0.3)
- wrike (3.0.3)
- zenventory (3.0.3)
This indicates that version 3.0.3 is a stable and current version of the platform package.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other similar integrations use the same platform version
# to ensure consistency across the codebase
# Search for platform dependency versions in other components
echo "Checking @pipedream/platform versions across components:"
fd package.json components/ --exec grep -l "@pipedream/platform" {} \; | \
xargs grep -l "\"@pipedream/platform\":" | \
xargs grep "\"@pipedream/platform\":"
Length of output: 92767
components/flexisign/actions/send-document-using-template/send-document-using-template.mjs (1)
1-2: LGTM! Imports are properly structured.
The imports correctly reference the necessary dependencies using relative paths and ES module syntax.
| props: { | ||
| flexisign, | ||
| templateId: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| flexisign, | ||
| "templateId", | ||
| ], | ||
| reloadProps: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add required recipients property to props.
According to the PR objectives, the component should allow specifying recipients for the signature request. However, the recipients property is missing from the props definition.
Add the recipients property to props:
props: {
flexisign,
templateId: {
propDefinition: [
flexisign,
"templateId",
],
reloadProps: true,
},
+ recipients: {
+ type: "string[]",
+ label: "Recipients",
+ description: "Email addresses of the recipients who need to sign the document",
+ required: true,
+ },
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| props: { | |
| flexisign, | |
| templateId: { | |
| propDefinition: [ | |
| flexisign, | |
| "templateId", | |
| ], | |
| reloadProps: true, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| props: { | |
| flexisign, | |
| templateId: { | |
| propDefinition: [ | |
| flexisign, | |
| "templateId", | |
| ], | |
| reloadProps: true, | |
| }, | |
| recipients: { | |
| type: "string[]", | |
| label: "Recipients", | |
| description: "Email addresses of the recipients who need to sign the document", | |
| required: true, | |
| }, | |
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This makes sense given the component description mentions 'specified recipients'. Is the recipient prop being mounted in additionalProps? If not, the description should be updated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@GTFalcao, thank you for pointing this out. The recipients prop is being added in the additionalProps method based on the selected templateId. The additionalProps function dynamically generates props from the template's bodyStructure, which includes recipients. Given this, we should update the component's description to clarify that the recipients are specified dynamically based on the template's structure.
components/flexisign/actions/send-document-using-template/send-document-using-template.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| props: { | ||
| flexisign, | ||
| templateId: { | ||
| propDefinition: [ | ||
| flexisign, | ||
| "templateId", | ||
| ], | ||
| reloadProps: true, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This makes sense given the component description mentions 'specified recipients'. Is the recipient prop being mounted in additionalProps? If not, the description should be updated
Hi @GTFalcao, The template has its own number of recipients and specific props for each one, so yes they are created in the additional props |
|
/approve |
* flexisign init * [Components] flexisign #14491 Actions - Send Document Using Template * pnpm update
Resolves #14491.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation