Skip to content

Conversation

@GTFalcao
Copy link
Collaborator

@GTFalcao GTFalcao commented Nov 11, 2024

Closes #14560

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new optional property, fieldsToObtain, allowing users to specify which fields to retrieve for records.
  • Improvements
    • Enhanced configurability of the component regarding field selection for records.
    • Improved handling of record summaries with a fallback mechanism for identifiers.
  • Version Updates
    • Updated package version from 1.3.0 to 1.3.1.
    • Updated functionality version from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 11, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 11, 2024 5:44am
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 11, 2024 5:44am
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 11, 2024 5:44am

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request includes updates to the @pipedream/salesforce_rest_api package, specifically changing the version number from 1.3.0 to 1.3.1 in the package.json file. Additionally, the new-record-instant.mjs file has been modified to enhance field selection functionality. The version in this file is updated from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0, and a new optional property fieldsToObtain is introduced, allowing users to specify which fields to retrieve for records. The control flow in the timerActivateHook method is adjusted to prioritize user-defined fields.

Changes

File Change Summary
components/salesforce_rest_api/package.json Updated version from 1.3.0 to 1.3.1.
components/salesforce_rest_api/sources/new-record-instant/new-record-instant.mjs Added fieldsToObtain property; updated version from 0.1.0 to 0.2.0; modified timerActivateHook method.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Ensure new record trigger handles many columns without HTTP 414 errors (14560) It is unclear if the new fieldsToObtain property resolves the issue with too many columns.

🐇 In the fields we now can choose,
A little tweak, a path to use.
From one to two, the version's bright,
With options new, our future's light!
Fetch what you need, let choices flow,
In Salesforce fields, let data grow! 🌱


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
components/salesforce_rest_api/sources/new-record-instant/new-record-instant.mjs (2)

13-23: Enhance prop description to mention URI length limitation.

The fieldsToObtain prop effectively addresses the HTTP 414 error issue. Consider updating the description to explicitly mention this benefit:

-      description: "Select the field(s) to be retrieved for the records. Only applicable if the source is running on a timer. If running on a webhook, or if not specified, all fields will be retrieved.",
+      description: "Select specific fields to be retrieved for the records. This helps prevent HTTP 414 errors that can occur with objects containing many fields. Only applicable if the source is running on a timer. If running on a webhook, or if not specified, all fields will be retrieved.",

Line range hint 1-144: Excellent solution for handling large object types.

The implementation elegantly solves the HTTP 414 error issue by:

  1. Making field selection optional, maintaining backward compatibility
  2. Keeping all fields for webhook mode where URI length isn't an issue
  3. Allowing fine-grained control over fields in timer mode

This approach not only fixes the immediate issue but also provides better performance by reducing unnecessary data transfer.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c7e032 and 66ac239.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • components/salesforce_rest_api/package.json (1 hunks)
  • components/salesforce_rest_api/sources/new-record-instant/new-record-instant.mjs (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/salesforce_rest_api/package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/salesforce_rest_api/sources/new-record-instant/new-record-instant.mjs (1)

10-10: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.

The minor version increment (0.1.0 → 0.2.0) correctly reflects the addition of new functionality while maintaining backward compatibility.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/salesforce_rest_api/sources/new-record-instant/new-record-instant.mjs (1)

Line range hint 1-150: Overall architecture effectively addresses the URI length limitation.

The solution elegantly solves the HTTP 414 issue by:

  1. Making field selection optional, maintaining backward compatibility
  2. Clearly documenting the behavior difference between timer and webhook modes
  3. Providing a flexible way to control request size

However, consider adding a note in the documentation about best practices for field selection to help users avoid the HTTP 414 error proactively.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66ac239 and 7808014.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/salesforce_rest_api/sources/new-record-instant/new-record-instant.mjs (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/salesforce_rest_api/sources/new-record-instant/new-record-instant.mjs (3)

10-24: Version bump and new prop definition look good!

The version bump to 0.2.0 correctly follows semantic versioning as this adds new functionality. The fieldsToObtain prop is well-defined with clear documentation about its behavior in different modes.


57-57: Good defensive programming!

The nullish coalescing operator (??) ensures a valid summary by falling back to the ID when the name is null/undefined.


74-74: Consistent implementation with timer meta!

The same defensive programming approach is correctly applied to webhook meta generation, maintaining consistency across the codebase.

@GTFalcao
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve

@GTFalcao GTFalcao merged commit 04742bd into master Nov 12, 2024
12 checks passed
@GTFalcao GTFalcao deleted the 14560-salesforce-bugfix branch November 12, 2024 19:29
lcaresia pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
* version bumps

* Adding fieldsToObtain prop

* Adjustments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Salesforce new record trigger fails when object has too many columns

4 participants