New Components - zerobounce #14648
New Components - zerobounce #14648
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several new modules for email validation and scoring within the ZeroBounce component. It includes actions for validating a single email, validating emails from a file, estimating reliability scores for emails, and downloading validation results. Additionally, the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/zerobounce/actions/get-validation-results-file/get-validation-results-file.mjs (1)
1-39: Consider architectural improvements for file handlingFor a more robust implementation, consider these architectural improvements:
- Use streams for processing large files to reduce memory usage
- Implement a proper temporary file management system with automatic cleanup
- Consider using a dedicated file storage service for persistent storage if needed
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these improvements?
components/zerobounce/zerobounce.app.mjs (1)
7-9: Consider extracting the base URL to a constantFor better maintainability and easier version management, consider extracting the base URL and API version to constants.
+const BASE_URL = "https://api.zerobounce.net"; +const API_VERSION = "v2"; export default { type: "app", app: "zerobounce", methods: { _baseUrl() { - return "https://api.zerobounce.net/v2"; + return `${BASE_URL}/${API_VERSION}`; },components/zerobounce/actions/file-validation/file-validation.mjs (1)
110-116: Implement error handling for the API callThe API call to
validateEmailsInFilemay fail due to network issues or API errors. Add a try-catch block to handle exceptions and provide meaningful error messages.Apply this diff:
- response = await this.zerobounce.validateEmailsInFile({ - $, - data: formData, - headers: { - ...formData.getHeaders(), - }, - }); + try { + response = await this.zerobounce.validateEmailsInFile({ + $, + data: formData, + headers: { + ...formData.getHeaders(), + }, + }); + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`ZeroBounce API request failed: ${error.message}`); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
components/zerobounce/.gitignore(0 hunks)components/zerobounce/actions/ai-scoring/ai-scoring.mjs(1 hunks)components/zerobounce/actions/file-validation/file-validation.mjs(1 hunks)components/zerobounce/actions/get-validation-results-file/get-validation-results-file.mjs(1 hunks)components/zerobounce/actions/validate-email/validate-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/zerobounce/app/zerobounce.app.ts(0 hunks)components/zerobounce/package.json(1 hunks)components/zerobounce/zerobounce.app.mjs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/zerobounce/.gitignore
- components/zerobounce/app/zerobounce.app.ts
🔇 Additional comments (12)
components/zerobounce/package.json (3)
3-3: Version bump is appropriate
The minor version increment (0.0.2 → 0.1.0) aligns with semver conventions for adding new features.
15-18:
Remove unnecessary dependency and verify form-data usage
- The
pathmodule is a native Node.js module and shouldn't be listed as a dependency. - Please verify that the
form-datapackage is required for the file validation feature.
Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary dependency:
"dependencies": {
"@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3",
- "form-data": "^4.0.1",
- "path": "^0.12.7"
+ "form-data": "^4.0.1"
}✅ Verification successful
Keep form-data dependency but remove unnecessary path dependency
The form-data package is actively used in the file-validation action for handling file uploads to the ZeroBounce API. However, the path module is a native Node.js module and should be removed from dependencies.
Apply this diff:
"dependencies": {
"@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3",
- "form-data": "^4.0.1",
- "path": "^0.12.7"
+ "form-data": "^4.0.1"
}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify form-data usage in the codebase
# Check if form-data is actually used in the code
rg -l "require.*form-data|import.*form-data"
Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of zerobounce.app.mjs to see if form-data is used
cat components/zerobounce/zerobounce.app.mjs
# Also check any action files that might use form-data
fd -t f '.*\.js$|.*\.mjs$' components/zerobounce/actions/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 8905
5-5: Verify build process compatibility
The main entry point has changed from dist/app/zerobounce.app.mjs to zerobounce.app.mjs. Please ensure this aligns with the current build process.
✅ Verification successful
Entry point change is valid and compatible
The new entry point zerobounce.app.mjs exists in the correct location and there are no build-related configurations or references to the old dist path. The package appears to be a simple Node.js module without a build step, as evidenced by:
- The file exists at
components/zerobounce/zerobounce.app.mjs - No build configurations (webpack, rollup, etc.) are present
- No build scripts in package.json
- No references to the old dist path anywhere in the component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and location of the main entry point file
# and check for any build scripts that might reference the old path
# Check if the new entry point exists
fd -t f "zerobounce.app.mjs$"
# Look for any build configurations or scripts that might reference the old path
rg -l "dist/app/zerobounce.app.mjs"
Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for build scripts and configurations
rg -l "dist/app|dist.*zerobounce" components/zerobounce/
# Check package.json for build scripts and dist references
cat components/zerobounce/package.json
# Check if there are any TypeScript or build configurations
fd -t f "(tsconfig|rollup|webpack|vite|babel).*.json$" components/zerobounce/
Length of output: 667
components/zerobounce/actions/ai-scoring/ai-scoring.mjs (2)
7-7: Verify the component version
The version is set to "0.0.1". Let's verify if this is truly the first version of this component.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existing versions of the zerobounce component
# Search for other version declarations in zerobounce components
rg -g '*.{mjs,js}' '"version":\s*"[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"' components/zerobounce1-1: Verify the imported zerobounce module
The import looks correct, but let's verify the existence and exports of the zerobounce module.
✅ Verification successful
Import statement is correct and module exports required method
The zerobounce module exists at the correct relative path and exports the getReliabilityScore method that is needed for the AI scoring functionality. The import statement is properly configured.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the zerobounce module exists and exports getReliabilityScore
# Check if the module file exists
fd -e mjs "zerobounce.app.mjs$" components/zerobounce
# Check for getReliabilityScore method in the module
ast-grep --pattern 'getReliabilityScore($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 223
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the module and its exports
# Check if the module file exists
ls -l components/zerobounce/zerobounce.app.mjs
# Check the content of the module file
cat components/zerobounce/zerobounce.app.mjs
# Search for any reliability or scoring related methods
rg -i "reliability|score" components/zerobounce/zerobounce.app.mjs
Length of output: 1424
components/zerobounce/actions/validate-email/validate-email.mjs (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import statement follows the expected pattern
The import statement correctly references the zerobounce app module using a relative path.
3-9: Verify the initial version number
The component metadata is well-structured with appropriate key, name, and documentation link. However, please verify if "0.0.1" is the correct initial version number according to your versioning guidelines.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing component versions
fd -e mjs -e js . components/zerobounce -x grep -l "version:"30-37: Verify complete API parameter coverage
Let's ensure all available API parameters from the documentation are properly exposed through the component.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for validateEmail implementation to verify parameter handling
ast-grep --pattern 'validateEmail({
$$$
params: {
$$$
}
$$$
})'29-40: Enhance error handling and success message
- Verify that the zerobounce app module properly handles API errors
- Consider including the validation status in the success message
- $.export("$summary", `Successfully validated email: ${this.email}`);
+ $.export("$summary", `Successfully validated email ${this.email} with status: ${response.status}`);✅ Verification successful
Error handling appears sufficient through platform-level mechanisms
The action is built on top of the platform's infrastructure which shows evidence of proper error handling at multiple levels:
- The platform code (platform/dist/index.js) includes comprehensive error handling for configuration and runtime errors
- HTTP client errors would be caught and handled at the platform level
- The action's implementation follows the standard pattern where errors bubble up to be handled by the platform
Regarding the success message improvement suggestion - while including the status would be more informative, the current message is adequate for basic confirmation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check error handling in the zerobounce app module
ast-grep --pattern 'validateEmail($$$) {
try {
$$$
} catch {
$$$
}
}'
Length of output: 312
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the zerobounce app implementation
rg -A 10 "validateEmail.*\{" --type js
# Also check if there's a common error handling pattern in the app
rg -A 5 "throw new ConfigurationError|throw new Error" --type js
Length of output: 2371
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the zerobounce app's base HTTP client implementation
rg -A 10 "class.*extends.*" components/zerobounce/
# Also check if there's any global error handling in the app
rg -A 10 "app\.ts|app\.js|index\.(ts|js)" components/zerobounce/
Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the zerobounce app implementation specifically
cat components/zerobounce/app/zerobounce.mjs
# Also check if there's any common app base class that might handle errors
rg -l "class.*extends.*App" components/common/
Length of output: 227
components/zerobounce/zerobounce.app.mjs (2)
3-6: LGTM: App configuration follows best practices
1-53: Verify secure handling of sensitive data
Since this module handles email addresses and API keys, ensure:
- The API key is stored securely in environment variables
- Email addresses are properly sanitized before sending to the API
- Response data containing email addresses is handled securely
- File data is properly validated and sanitized before processing
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential security issues in the codebase
# Check for hardcoded API keys or sensitive data
rg -i '(api[_-]?key|secret|password|credential)' --type js
# Check for email validation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'email.match($_)'components/zerobounce/actions/file-validation/file-validation.mjs (1)
86-86: Verify access to the API key
Ensure that the API key is correctly accessed from the authentication object. Confirm that this.zerobounce.$auth.api_key returns the expected value and adjust if necessary.
Run the following script to check the API key access:
✅ Verification successful
API key access pattern is correctly implemented
The implementation is consistent with the app's authentication pattern. The zerobounce.app.mjs file shows that $auth.api_key is properly used in the base implementation for all API requests, and the file validation action follows the same pattern. The API key is accessed correctly through this.zerobounce.$auth.api_key.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the API key is correctly accessed in the codebase.
# Search for occurrences of $auth.api_key in the zerobounce components.
rg 'this\.zerobounce\.\$auth\.api_key' components/zerobounce/
Length of output: 194
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the authentication pattern in zerobounce components
# Check the app file and common files for auth setup
fd "zerobounce\.(app|common)\." --exec cat {}
# Check for any auth-related configuration or setup
rg -i "auth.*api.?key" components/zerobounce/ -A 3
# Look for the component definition to understand the auth structure
ast-grep --pattern 'export default {
$$$
props: {
$$$
}
$$$
}' components/zerobounce/
Length of output: 2008
components/zerobounce/actions/get-validation-results-file/get-validation-results-file.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/zerobounce/actions/get-validation-results-file/get-validation-results-file.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
components/zerobounce/actions/get-validation-results-file/get-validation-results-file.mjs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/zerobounce/actions/get-validation-results-file/get-validation-results-file.mjs (1)
36-44: Enhance error handling in validateFileIdThe catch block swallows the original error, which could be useful for debugging. Consider including it in the error message.
async validateFileId({ $ }) { try { return await this.getResultsFile({ $, }); - } catch { - throw new ConfigurationError("File not found. Make sure the File ID is correct"); + } catch (error) { + throw new ConfigurationError( + `File not found. Make sure the File ID is correct. Details: ${error.message}` + ); } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/zerobounce/actions/get-validation-results-file/get-validation-results-file.mjs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/zerobounce/actions/get-validation-results-file/get-validation-results-file.mjs (4)
1-3:
Switch to async file operations
The synchronous fs module can block the Node.js event loop. Use the promise-based fs.promises API instead.
-import fs from "fs";
+import { promises as fs } from "fs";18-22:
Add validation to prevent path traversal
The fileName prop needs validation to prevent directory traversal attacks.
fileName: {
type: "string",
label: "File Name",
description: "The filename to save the file as in the \"/tmp\" directory",
+ validate: (value) => {
+ if (value.includes("/") || value.includes("\\")) {
+ throw new Error("File name cannot contain path separators");
+ }
+ },
},46-63:
Add comprehensive error handling and resource management
The run method needs several critical improvements:
- Error handling for API calls and file operations
- File size limits to prevent disk space issues
- Cleanup of temporary files
- Async file operations
async run({ $ }) {
+ try {
if (!(await this.validateFileId({
$,
}))) {
return;
}
const response = await this.getResultsFile({
$,
responseType: "arraybuffer",
});
+ // Check file size
+ const maxSize = 100 * 1024 * 1024; // 100MB
+ if (response.length > maxSize) {
+ throw new Error("File size exceeds maximum limit");
+ }
const filePath = `/tmp/${this.fileName}`;
- fs.writeFileSync(filePath, response);
+ await fs.writeFile(filePath, response);
$.export("$summary", `File saved to ${filePath}`);
+ // Schedule cleanup
+ setTimeout(async () => {
+ try {
+ await fs.unlink(filePath);
+ } catch (err) {
+ console.error(`Failed to cleanup file ${filePath}:`, err);
+ }
+ }, 3600000); // Cleanup after 1 hour
return filePath;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to process validation results: ${error.message}`);
+ }
},28-35: Verify ZeroBounce API integration
Let's verify that the getResultsFile method is properly implemented in the ZeroBounce app file.
✅ Verification successful
ZeroBounce API integration is properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The
getResultsFilemethod is correctly implemented inzerobounce.app.mjsusing the proper endpoint URLhttps://bulkapi.zerobounce.net/v2/getfile - The method is properly invoked from the action component with the required
file_idparameter - Error handling is in place for file not found scenarios
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if getResultsFile method is properly implemented in zerobounce.app.mjs
# Search for getResultsFile method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'getResultsFile($_) {
$$$
}'
# Check for the API endpoint URL
rg -A 5 'getResultsFile|GET_FILE_URL'
Length of output: 2905
|
/approve |
Resolves #13258
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Chores
.gitignoreand deprecated application files.