[Components] zulip #13319 #15508
[Components] zulip #13319 #15508
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@lcaresia has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis pull request removes two legacy files and introduces several new modules for Zulip integrations. A new action for sending messages is implemented with robust validation. Additionally, a module is added for defining message type constants, and a new Zulip app module is created to handle API interactions. The package configuration has been updated with a version bump, revised main entry, removal of unnecessary files, and an added dependency on the Pipedream platform. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant S as SendMessage Action
participant A as Zulip App Module
participant Z as Zulip API
U->>S: Initiate send message request with details
S->>S: Validate message type and required IDs
S->>A: Call sendMessage with parameters
A->>Z: Make HTTP request via axios
Z-->>A: Return response (message ID, etc.)
A-->>S: Return message summary
S-->>U: Output success message with message ID
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
components/zulip/zulip.app.mjs (1)
52-57: Consider enhancing auth handling.The template literals for auth credentials are unnecessary since
this.$auth.emailandthis.$auth.api_keyare already strings.- username: `${this.$auth.email}`, - password: `${this.$auth.api_key}`, + username: this.$auth.email, + password: this.$auth.api_key,components/zulip/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs (2)
71-71: Fix typo in success message.There's a typo in "Successfully".
- $.export("$summary", `Sucessfully sent message with ID ${response.id}`); + $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent message with ID ${response.id}`);
44-44: Add JSDoc for the run method.Consider adding JSDoc documentation for the run method to improve code maintainability.
+ /** + * Sends a message through Zulip API + * @param {Object} param0 - The parameters object + * @param {Object} param0.$ - The context object + * @returns {Promise<Object>} The API response + */ async run({ $ }) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
components/zulip/.gitignore(0 hunks)components/zulip/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/zulip/app/zulip.app.ts(0 hunks)components/zulip/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/zulip/package.json(1 hunks)components/zulip/zulip.app.mjs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/zulip/.gitignore
- components/zulip/app/zulip.app.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/zulip/common/constants.mjs (1)
1-8: LGTM! Well-structured constants file.The implementation follows good practices by centralizing type definitions in a dedicated constants file. The types are comprehensive and cover Zulip's messaging capabilities.
components/zulip/zulip.app.mjs (1)
1-7: LGTM! Well-structured app module.The module follows good practices with clear imports and proper app type definition.
components/zulip/package.json (1)
3-17: LGTM! Package configuration is properly updated.The changes appropriately reflect:
- Version bump for new features
- Updated main entry point
- Required platform dependency
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores