New Component - verifi_email #17676
New Component - verifi_email #17676
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughA new Verifi Email integration is introduced, featuring an action to validate email addresses via the Verifi Email API. The implementation includes a new action module, an updated app module with API interaction logic, and package metadata adjustments to support dependencies and versioning. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ActionModule as Validate Email Address Action
participant AppModule as Verifi Email App
participant VerifiAPI as Verifi Email API
User->>ActionModule: Provide email to validate
ActionModule->>AppModule: Call validateEmailAddress(email)
AppModule->>VerifiAPI: HTTP GET /check?email=...&api_key=...
VerifiAPI-->>AppModule: Validation response
AppModule-->>ActionModule: Return result
ActionModule-->>User: Output validation summary and result
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/verifi_email/actions/validate-email-address/validate-email-address.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/verifi_email/verifi_email.app.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/verifi_email/actions/validate-email-address/validate-email-address.mjs (1)
11-15: Consider adding email format validation.While the current implementation accepts any string, consider adding basic email format validation to provide better user experience and catch obvious errors before making the API call.
You could add a validation pattern or use a more specific input type:
email: { type: "string", label: "Email Address", description: "The email address to validate", + pattern: /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/, },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
components/verifi_email/actions/validate-email-address/validate-email-address.mjs(1 hunks)components/verifi_email/package.json(2 hunks)components/verifi_email/verifi_email.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
components/verifi_email/package.json (1)
Learnt from: jcortes
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14935
File: components/sailpoint/package.json:15-18
Timestamp: 2024-12-12T19:23:09.039Z
Learning: When developing Pipedream components, do not add built-in Node.js modules like `fs` to `package.json` dependencies, as they are native modules provided by the Node.js runtime.
components/verifi_email/actions/validate-email-address/validate-email-address.mjs (3)
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T15:33:38.240Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
Learnt from: GTFalcao
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#12731
File: components/hackerone/actions/get-members/get-members.mjs:3-28
Timestamp: 2024-07-04T18:11:59.822Z
Learning: When exporting a summary message in the `run` method of an action, ensure the message is correctly formatted. For example, in the `hackerone-get-members` action, the correct format is `Successfully retrieved ${response.data.length} members`.
Learnt from: jcortes
PR: PipedreamHQ/pipedream#14467
File: components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs:4-6
Timestamp: 2024-10-30T15:24:39.294Z
Learning: In `components/gainsight_px/actions/create-account/create-account.mjs`, the action name should be "Create Account" instead of "Create Memory".
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/verifi_email/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM - Appropriate version bump for new feature.The version bump from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0 correctly reflects the addition of new functionality.
15-17: LGTM - Correct dependency addition.The
@pipedream/platformdependency is properly added and required for the axios HTTP client used in the app module.components/verifi_email/verifi_email.app.mjs (2)
1-1: LGTM - Correct import for HTTP client.The axios import from
@pipedream/platformis the correct way to make HTTP requests in Pipedream components.
8-19: LGTM - Well-implemented API method.The
validateEmailAddressmethod correctly:
- Follows Pipedream app method conventions
- Uses the authenticated API key from
this.$auth.api_key- Makes a secure HTTPS request to the Verifi Email API
- Properly merges parameters and options
The implementation is clean and follows established patterns.
components/verifi_email/actions/validate-email-address/validate-email-address.mjs (3)
1-1: LGTM - Correct app module import.The relative import path for the verifiEmail app module is correct.
3-16: LGTM - Well-structured action metadata and props.The action metadata is properly defined with:
- Descriptive key following naming conventions
- Clear name and description
- Documentation link provided
- Appropriate version for new action
- Correct prop definitions including the app reference and email input
17-26: LGTM - Proper action implementation.The
runmethod correctly:
- Calls the app's
validateEmailAddressmethod- Passes the execution context (
$)- Provides the email parameter
- Exports a properly formatted summary message
- Returns the API response
The summary message format follows the established pattern from the retrieved learnings.
jcortes
left a comment
jcortes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @michelle0927 lgtm! Ready for QA!
Resolves #17528
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores