updated tool annotations output #18497
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 2 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughAdds an annotations metadata field and bumps patch versions across many Slack action modules. Introduces a new CLI utility and README to apply annotations from a CSV to action files. No runtime logic changes in actions; the script handles CSV parsing, file updates, version increments, and reporting. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
actor U as User
participant CLI as apply-annotations.js
participant G as Git
participant CSV as CSV Loader
participant FS as File System
participant AP as AnnotationApplier
U->>CLI: Run with --csv, --limit/--offset, --verbose
CLI->>G: Check working tree status
G-->>CLI: Status result
CLI->>AP: Instantiate with options
AP->>CSV: Load & parse CSV -> map(actionKey -> hints)
AP->>FS: Discover action files under components/*/actions/
loop Batch processing
AP->>FS: Read next file
AP->>AP: Extract actionKey, detect existing annotations
alt Needs update
AP->>AP: Increment patch version
AP->>AP: Build indent-aware annotations block
AP->>FS: Write updated file
else Skip
AP-->>AP: Record skip reason
end
end
AP-->>CLI: Summary (modified/processed/skipped/errors)
CLI-->>U: Print report
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🧪 Early access (Sonnet 4.5): enabledWe are currently testing the Sonnet 4.5 model, which is expected to improve code review quality. However, this model may lead to increased noise levels in the review comments. Please disable the early access features if the noise level causes any inconvenience. Note:
Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
scripts/tool-annotations/apply-annotations.js (2)
247-279: Consider validating modified files.The script writes modified content without verifying the result is syntactically valid JavaScript. A malformed regex match or indentation issue could produce broken files.
Add basic syntax validation after modification:
// Apply changes const modifiedContent = this.applyAnnotations(fileContent, annotations); + +// Basic syntax check - verify the file is still valid +try { + // Quick syntax validation without executing + new Function(modifiedContent); +} catch (syntaxError) { + throw new Error(`Modified file has syntax error: ${syntaxError.message}`); +} + fs.writeFileSync(filePath, modifiedContent, 'utf8');
202-210: Semver assumption holds for current files but lacks strict validation.All
versionfields incomponents/slack/actionsfollow a simpleX.Y.Zpattern, soincrementVersionworks today—but it still doesn’t enforce that each segment is numeric or handle prerelease/build metadata. Recommend either adding explicit numeric checks or switching to a dedicated semver library to future-proof version increments.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
scripts/tool-annotations/registry-action-chatgpt-2025-09-25.csvis excluded by!**/*.csvscripts/tool-annotations/registry-actions-claude-2025-09-29.csvis excluded by!**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (35)
components/slack/actions/add-emoji-reaction/add-emoji-reaction.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/approve-workflow/approve-workflow.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/archive-channel/archive-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/create-channel/create-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/create-reminder/create-reminder.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/delete-file/delete-file.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/delete-message/delete-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/find-message/find-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/find-user-by-email/find-user-by-email.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/get-file/get-file.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/invite-user-to-channel/invite-user-to-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/kick-user/kick-user.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-channels/list-channels.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-files/list-files.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-group-members/list-group-members.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-members-in-channel/list-members-in-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-replies/list-replies.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/reply-to-a-message/reply-to-a-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-large-message/send-large-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-message-advanced/send-message-advanced.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-message-to-channel/send-message-to-channel.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/set-channel-description/set-channel-description.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/set-channel-topic/set-channel-topic.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/set-status/set-status.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/update-group-members/update-group-members.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/update-message/update-message.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs(1 hunks)components/slack/actions/verify-slack-signature/verify-slack-signature.mjs(1 hunks)scripts/tool-annotations/README.md(1 hunks)scripts/tool-annotations/apply-annotations.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
scripts/tool-annotations/apply-annotations.js (1)
scripts/generate-package-report.js (1)
componentsDir(62-62)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (53)
components/slack/actions/create-reminder/create-reminder.mjs (2)
7-7: LGTM!The patch version bump is appropriate for adding metadata without changing runtime behavior.
8-12: LGTM!The annotations metadata accurately reflects the action's behavior:
destructiveHint: false– correct, creating a reminder doesn't delete or permanently alter existing dataopenWorldHint: true– correct, the action calls the external Slack APIreadOnlyHint: false– correct, creating a reminder is a write operationcomponents/slack/actions/list-replies/list-replies.mjs (2)
7-7: LGTM!Appropriate patch version bump for adding metadata without changing runtime behavior.
8-12: LGTM! Annotations accurately reflect the action's behavior.The annotations are correct:
destructiveHint: false- The action only retrieves conversation replies without modifying dataopenWorldHint: true- Makes external API calls to SlackreadOnlyHint: true- Performs read-only operationscomponents/slack/actions/list-group-members/list-group-members.mjs (2)
7-7: LGTM!Patch version bump is appropriate for adding metadata annotations without changing runtime behavior.
8-12: Approve: annotations match other Slack list- actions.*
- destructiveHint: false
- readOnlyHint: true
- openWorldHint: true
Please ensure a centralized annotation schema/validator exists and is applied across all actions.
components/slack/actions/find-user-by-email/find-user-by-email.mjs (1)
7-7: LGTM! Appropriate version bump.The patch version increment is appropriate for adding metadata without changing runtime behavior.
components/slack/actions/archive-channel/archive-channel.mjs (2)
8-8: LGTM!Patch version bump is appropriate for a metadata-only change.
9-13: Annotations: tooling present — confirm destructiveHint semantics
- Verified: scripts/tool-annotations/apply-annotations.js (and README) applies destructiveHint/openWorldHint/readOnlyHint from CSV and inserts the annotations; the CSV includes slack-archive-channel with destructiveHint=true, openWorldHint=true, readOnlyHint=false.
- No formal schema or runtime semantics found; validation is limited to CSV header presence and boolean parsing in apply-annotations.js.
- Action: confirm whether destructiveHint is intended to mean "irreversible" or simply "state-changing" (Slack channel archive is reversible; keep true if you mean "modifies state").
components/slack/actions/kick-user/kick-user.mjs (2)
8-8: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.The patch version bump correctly reflects the metadata addition without runtime changes.
9-13: Annotations are semantically correct for this action.The annotation values appropriately reflect the action's behavior:
destructiveHint: truecorrectly indicates that kicking a user is a destructive operationopenWorldHint: truecorrectly indicates interaction with the Slack APIreadOnlyHint: falsecorrectly indicates state modificationcomponents/slack/actions/verify-slack-signature/verify-slack-signature.mjs (2)
8-8: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.
9-13: VerifyopenWorldHint: trueis appropriate for local signature verification.The annotations are mostly correct, but
openWorldHint: truemay need clarification:
destructiveHint: falseandreadOnlyHint: trueare correct (pure verification with no mutations)openWorldHint: true- This action performs local cryptographic verification without making external API calls. IfopenWorldHintis intended to indicate external API interaction, this should befalse. However, if it indicates the action is part of a workflow involving external systems (verifying requests FROM Slack), thentruemay be appropriate.Please clarify the semantics of
openWorldHintto ensure consistency across all actions. If it means "makes external API calls," this should likely befalse.components/slack/actions/list-files/list-files.mjs (2)
7-7: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.
8-12: Annotations are semantically correct.All annotation values appropriately reflect this read-only list operation:
destructiveHint: false(no destructive operations)openWorldHint: true(interacts with Slack API)readOnlyHint: true(no state modifications)components/slack/actions/send-message/send-message.mjs (2)
9-9: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.
10-14: Annotations are semantically correct.All annotation values appropriately reflect this message-sending operation:
destructiveHint: false(creates content, not destructive)openWorldHint: true(interacts with Slack API)readOnlyHint: false(modifies state by creating messages)components/slack/actions/update-group-members/update-group-members.mjs (2)
7-7: LGTM! Version bump is appropriate.
8-12: Annotations are semantically correct.All annotation values appropriately reflect this group membership modification operation:
destructiveHint: true(removing users from groups is a destructive operation)openWorldHint: true(interacts with Slack API)readOnlyHint: false(modifies state by changing group membership)components/slack/actions/list-channels/list-channels.mjs (1)
7-12: LGTM! Annotations accurately reflect the action's behavior.The annotations correctly classify this action as read-only (listing channels), non-destructive, and requiring external API access to Slack.
components/slack/actions/send-large-message/send-large-message.mjs (1)
8-13: LGTM! Annotations correctly identify this as a write operation.The annotations appropriately classify this action as a non-destructive write operation (posting messages) that requires external API access.
components/slack/actions/reply-to-a-message/reply-to-a-message.mjs (1)
9-14: LGTM! Annotations match the action's write behavior.The annotations correctly classify this as a non-destructive write operation that creates threaded replies.
components/slack/actions/send-message-to-channel/send-message-to-channel.mjs (1)
9-14: LGTM! Annotations appropriately reflect message-sending behavior.The annotations correctly identify this as a non-destructive write operation for posting messages to channels.
components/slack/actions/find-message/find-message.mjs (1)
7-12: LGTM! Annotations correctly classify this as a read-only search operation.The annotations appropriately identify this action as non-destructive, read-only, and requiring external API access for message search.
components/slack/actions/set-channel-description/set-channel-description.mjs (1)
7-12: LGTM! Metadata annotations are semantically correct.The version bump and annotations addition are appropriate. The annotation values correctly reflect that this action modifies channel state (readOnly=false), interacts with external Slack API (openWorld=true), and is non-destructive (destructive=false).
components/slack/actions/list-users/list-users.mjs (1)
7-12: LGTM! Read-only annotations are correct.The annotations accurately reflect the read-only nature of this action (readOnly=true), with appropriate flags for non-destructive (destructive=false) external API interaction (openWorld=true).
components/slack/actions/get-file/get-file.mjs (1)
7-12: LGTM! Annotations correctly reflect read-only operation.The annotations are appropriate for a file retrieval action with readOnly=true, destructive=false, and openWorld=true for external API interaction.
components/slack/actions/delete-message/delete-message.mjs (1)
7-12: LGTM! Destructive operation correctly annotated.The annotations are semantically correct for a delete operation with destructive=true, readOnly=false, and openWorld=true for external Slack API interaction.
components/slack/actions/set-channel-topic/set-channel-topic.mjs (1)
8-12: Confirm intention behind destructiveHint for channel-topic actionIn components/slack/actions/set-channel-topic/set-channel-topic.mjs,
destructiveHintis set totrue, whereas in set-channel-description it’sfalse. Both actions overwrite channel metadata; please verify whether topic changes should indeed be considered destructive, or adjust to align the flags consistently.components/slack/actions/send-block-kit-message/send-block-kit-message.mjs (1)
10-15: LGTM! Annotations are appropriate for a message-sending action.The annotations correctly classify this action as non-destructive (doesn't delete/modify existing data), external (interacts with Slack API), and non-read-only (creates new messages). Version bump follows semantic versioning.
components/slack/actions/create-channel/create-channel.mjs (1)
7-12: LGTM! Annotations correctly classify channel creation.The annotations appropriately mark this as a non-destructive, external, non-read-only action. Channel creation adds new resources without modifying or deleting existing ones.
components/slack/actions/send-message-advanced/send-message-advanced.mjs (1)
10-15: LGTM! Annotations consistent with other message-sending actions.The annotations are appropriate and consistent with the send-block-kit-message action, correctly classifying this as a non-destructive message-sending operation.
components/slack/actions/update-profile/update-profile.mjs (1)
8-13: LGTM! Correctly marked as destructive.The annotations appropriately classify this action as destructive since it modifies existing user profile data. This is a key distinction from message-sending actions (which create new data rather than modifying existing data) and demonstrates proper understanding of the destructiveHint classification.
components/slack/actions/set-status/set-status.mjs (1)
7-12: LGTM! Annotations consistent with profile-modifying actions.The annotations correctly mark this as destructive since it modifies existing user status. This is consistent with update-profile.mjs, as both actions modify existing user state rather than creating new resources.
components/slack/actions/invite-user-to-channel/invite-user-to-channel.mjs (1)
7-12: Annotations look appropriate for this action's behavior.The annotations correctly classify this action as non-destructive (doesn't delete data), state-modifying (adds a user to a channel), and interacting with external systems (Slack API).
components/slack/actions/update-message/update-message.mjs (1)
7-12: Annotations correctly reflect the destructive nature of message updates.The
destructiveHint: trueappropriately flags that updating a message overwrites existing content, which is a destructive operation.components/slack/actions/send-message-to-user-or-group/send-message-to-user-or-group.mjs (1)
10-15: Annotations appropriately classify this message-sending action.The annotations correctly indicate this is a non-destructive (creates new content), state-modifying operation that interacts with external systems.
components/slack/actions/list-members-in-channel/list-members-in-channel.mjs (1)
7-12: Correct read-only classification for this list operation.The
readOnlyHint: truecorrectly identifies this action as performing only data retrieval without modification, distinguishing it from the other actions under review.components/slack/actions/delete-file/delete-file.mjs (1)
7-12: Annotations appropriately flag this as a destructive operation.The
destructiveHint: truecorrectly identifies file deletion as a destructive action that permanently removes data.scripts/tool-annotations/apply-annotations.js (10)
82-107: LGTM! Flexible header validation.The header validation correctly supports multiple aliases and provides clear error messages when required columns are missing.
109-117: LGTM! Batch slicing logic is correct.The offset/limit logic correctly handles CSV slicing and preserves the header row. The 1-based logging aligns with user expectations.
119-160: LGTM! Robust CSV loading.The CSV loading logic properly validates the file, handles per-row errors gracefully, and provides useful warnings for invalid entries.
193-200: LGTM! Regex extraction is adequate for action files.The key extraction and annotation detection use simple regex patterns suitable for the expected action file structure.
302-311: LGTM! Advisory git status check.The git status check appropriately warns without blocking execution, allowing users to make informed decisions.
313-328: LGTM! Clear progress reporting.Batch processing with progress updates provides good user feedback during long-running operations.
363-431: LGTM! Comprehensive CLI interface.The argument parsing is thorough with validation, helpful error messages, and detailed usage documentation.
434-450: LGTM! Proper module structure.The script correctly handles both CLI execution and module export scenarios with appropriate error handling and exit codes.
187-191: Path filter is correct—no unintended matches found. Verified only.mjsfiles under/actions/(excluding/common/) are matched; no false positives.
222-245: Version field formatting assumptions holdAll
versionentries incomponents/slack/actionsuse theversion: "x.y.z",\npattern and there are no CRLF line endings, so the existing regex and annotation insertion logic require no changes.scripts/tool-annotations/README.md (1)
1-31: LGTM! Clear documentation.The README accurately documents the script's functionality with helpful examples and options. The batch processing workflow is well illustrated.
components/slack/actions/add-emoji-reaction/add-emoji-reaction.mjs (1)
7-12: LGTM! Annotations are semantically correct.The annotation values appropriately reflect the action's behavior:
- Not destructive (adds data, doesn't remove)
- Requires open-world context (Slack channels, messages)
- Not read-only (modifies message state)
components/slack/actions/upload-file/upload-file.mjs (1)
11-16: LGTM! Annotations are semantically correct.The annotation values appropriately reflect the upload action's behavior:
- Not destructive (creates new files)
- Requires open-world context (Slack channels)
- Not read-only (uploads new files)
components/slack/actions/approve-workflow/approve-workflow.mjs (1)
8-13: LGTM! Annotations are semantically correct.The annotation values appropriately reflect the workflow approval action's behavior:
- Not destructive (sends approval message)
- Requires open-world context (Slack channels)
- Not read-only (posts new messages)
| annotations: { | ||
| destructiveHint: false, | ||
| openWorldHint: true, | ||
| readOnlyHint: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
🧩 Analysis chain
Annotations are semantically correct for this read-only action.
The annotation values accurately reflect the behavior of this action:
readOnlyHint: trueis correct since the action only callslookupUserByEmaildestructiveHint: falseis appropriate as no data is modified or deletedopenWorldHint: trueaccurately indicates the external Slack API call
Please verify that type definitions or schema validation exist for the annotations field to ensure consistency across all actions where these annotations are being added.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for type definitions or schemas for the annotations field
# Search for TypeScript definitions or JSDoc comments defining annotations structure
rg -n -C3 'annotations.*\{' --type=ts --type=js
# Search for schema validation or documentation of annotation fields
rg -n -C3 '(destructiveHint|openWorldHint|readOnlyHint)' --type=ts --type=js --type=md
# Look for the tool-annotations script mentioned in the AI summary
fd -t f 'AnnotationApplier|tool-annotations' --exec cat {}Length of output: 6972
Define and enforce a schema for the annotations field
No type definitions or runtime validations exist for annotations (destructiveHint, openWorldHint, readOnlyHint). Add a shared interface or JSDoc typedef and integrate build-time or runtime validation to guarantee consistency across all actions.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/slack/actions/find-user-by-email/find-user-by-email.mjs around
lines 8 to 12, the annotations object lacks type and runtime validation; add a
shared JSDoc typedef or TypeScript interface (e.g., ActionAnnotations with
destructiveHint/openWorldHint/readOnlyHint as booleans) in a common module and
update this file to import/use that type (or add matching JSDoc @typedef) and
enforce it at runtime by validating the annotations object (e.g., a small
validator that checks required keys and boolean values or use a shared
validation utility) and throw or log a clear error when validation fails so all
actions follow the same schema.
| parseCSVLine(line) { | ||
| const values = []; | ||
| let current = ''; | ||
| let inQuotes = false; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const char of line) { | ||
| if (char === '"') { | ||
| inQuotes = !inQuotes; | ||
| } else if (char === ',' && !inQuotes) { | ||
| values.push(current.trim()); | ||
| current = ''; | ||
| } else { | ||
| current += char; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| values.push(current.trim()); | ||
| return values; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CSV parser doesn't handle escaped quotes.
The parseCSVLine method toggles quote state but doesn't handle escaped quotes within quoted values (e.g., "value with ""quotes""). If the CSV contains such values, parsing will fail.
Consider using a battle-tested CSV library like csv-parse for production reliability:
+const { parse } = require('csv-parse/sync');
+
parseCSVLine(line) {
- const values = [];
- let current = '';
- let inQuotes = false;
-
- for (const char of line) {
- if (char === '"') {
- inQuotes = !inQuotes;
- } else if (char === ',' && !inQuotes) {
- values.push(current.trim());
- current = '';
- } else {
- current += char;
- }
- }
-
- values.push(current.trim());
- return values;
+ const records = parse(line, {
+ trim: true,
+ skip_empty_lines: false
+ });
+ return records[0];
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| parseCSVLine(line) { | |
| const values = []; | |
| let current = ''; | |
| let inQuotes = false; | |
| for (const char of line) { | |
| if (char === '"') { | |
| inQuotes = !inQuotes; | |
| } else if (char === ',' && !inQuotes) { | |
| values.push(current.trim()); | |
| current = ''; | |
| } else { | |
| current += char; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| values.push(current.trim()); | |
| return values; | |
| } | |
| const { parse } = require('csv-parse/sync'); | |
| parseCSVLine(line) { | |
| const records = parse(line, { | |
| trim: true, | |
| skip_empty_lines: false | |
| }); | |
| return records[0]; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In scripts/tool-annotations/apply-annotations.js around lines 55 to 73, the
parseCSVLine implementation toggles quote state but doesn't handle escaped
quotes ("" inside a quoted field), causing incorrect parsing for values like
"value with ""quotes"". Update the parser to detect when a quote char appears
while inQuotes and the next char is also a quote, treat that pair as an escaped
quote by appending a single quote character to the current field and advancing
the cursor past the second quote instead of toggling the inQuotes flag;
otherwise keep the existing toggling and comma-splitting logic. Alternatively,
replace this custom logic by using a robust CSV parsing library (e.g.,
csv-parse) and adjust callers accordingly; add unit tests covering quoted fields
with escaped quotes, unquoted fields, and mixed cases.
1 participant
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit