-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
[FIX] Set restli protocol version header back to 2.0 #18825
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 2 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughBumped versions across LinkedIn Ads actions and sources, added a constants module exporting LinkedIn header values, introduced a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant App as LinkedIn Ads App
participant Const as constants.mjs
participant API as LinkedIn API
Note over Const,App: New constants export
App->>Const: import VERSION_HEADER, RESTLI_PROTOCOL_VERSION
App->>App: _getHeaders(authToken)
Note right of App: builds headers:\nAuthorization, Content-Type,\nLinkedin-Version, X-Restli-Protocol-Version
App->>API: HTTP request with headers
API-->>App: response
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
a54b844 to
428842e
Compare
428842e to
76ffc39
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
WHY
Resolves #18686
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores