Skip to content

Messaging API with RabbitMQ support #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2022
Merged

Messaging API with RabbitMQ support #1

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2022

Conversation

mocsharp
Copy link
Collaborator

@mocsharp mocsharp commented Apr 5, 2022

  • Migrated messaging layer source code from Informatics Gateway
  • Setup CI to:
    • build
    • publish all builds to GitHub packages
    • publish main and release/* builds to NuGet
    • Perform CodeQL Analysis
    • Secret detection
    • Run unit test if any
    • SonarCloud report
    • CodeCov report

@mocsharp mocsharp added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 5, 2022
@mocsharp mocsharp added this to the 0.1.0 milestone Apr 5, 2022
@mocsharp mocsharp self-assigned this Apr 5, 2022
@mocsharp mocsharp force-pushed the vchang/rabbitmq branch 4 times, most recently from 9c80aeb to 87f99e4 Compare April 5, 2022 22:09
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 5, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@ae43f4c). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main           #1   +/-   ##
===========================================
  Coverage        ?   100.00000%           
===========================================
  Files           ?            1           
  Lines           ?            2           
  Branches        ?            0           
===========================================
  Hits            ?            2           
  Misses          ?            0           
  Partials        ?            0
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00000% <0.00000%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ae43f4c...8026bb5. Read the comment docs.

@mocsharp mocsharp force-pushed the vchang/rabbitmq branch 13 times, most recently from 21db83d to a2e76c5 Compare April 5, 2022 23:14
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 5, 2022

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

0.0% 0.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@mocsharp mocsharp requested a review from evberrypi April 5, 2022 23:25
evberrypi
evberrypi reviewed Apr 5, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@evberrypi evberrypi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving all ISSUE_TEMPLATES, Documentation, and CI (workflow) files

@mocsharp mocsharp merged commit ba495cc into main Apr 5, 2022
@Project-MONAI Project-MONAI deleted a comment from github-actions bot Apr 6, 2022
@mocsharp mocsharp deleted the vchang/rabbitmq branch April 6, 2022 00:06
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.1.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@evberrypi evberrypi evberrypi left review comments

Assignees

@mocsharp mocsharp

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

Clinical Data Pipelines
Status: Done

Milestone

0.1.2

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mocsharp @evberrypi