Possible inconsistency between Medical Decathlon Task01 BrainTumour labels and ConvertToMultiChannelBasedOnBratsClassesd class #2064
Unanswered
coding17Star
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
While following the BraTS segmentation tutorial, I noticed something that confused me regarding the label definitions used in
ConvertToMultiChannelBasedOnBratsClassesd.The transform assumes:
and constructs ET as:
However, in the Medical Segmentation Decathlon Task01 BrainTumour dataset (http://medicaldecathlon.com/), the
dataset.jsonfile describes the labels as:To better understand this, I visualized labels 2 and 3 on the T1gd modality for several cases. Example :


Visually, label 3 appears to correspond to the contrast-enhancing rim, while label 2 appears to correspond to the inner non-enhancing/necrotic region, which seems consistent with the dataset.json description.
I could not find any label remapping step before

ConvertToMultiChannelBasedOnBratsClassesdin the tutorial pipeline.Based on the dataset description and the visual inspection above, I would have expected ET to correspond to label 3 rather than label 2.
Am I missing a remapping step somewhere, or is the tutorial assuming a different BraTS label convention than the Medical Decathlon Task01 dataset?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions