-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 5
Added logs for Project and Organization Endpoint #292
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
""" WalkthroughLogging functionality has been added to both organization and project API routes and their corresponding CRUD modules. Info and error logs are generated for key events such as creation, updates, deletions, not found errors, and inactive states. No changes were made to core logic, error handling, or public APIs. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Poem
""" Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/app/api/routes/project.py (1)
78-78: LGTM: Appropriate API endpoint logging.The logging strategy is sound - warning for not found cases and info for successful operations. The placement and log levels are appropriate for API endpoint monitoring.
Minor suggestion: Consider standardizing the log message format across the codebase. The CRUD layer uses quotes around field names (
'project_id') while API routes don't (project_id).Also applies to: 87-89
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
backend/app/api/routes/organization.py(5 hunks)backend/app/api/routes/project.py(5 hunks)backend/app/crud/organization.py(4 hunks)backend/app/crud/project.py(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
backend/app/crud/project.py (3)
backend/app/tests/crud/test_project.py (2)
test_create_project(16-33)test_validate_project_success(82-87)backend/app/api/routes/project_user.py (1)
add_user(23-53)backend/app/seed_data/seed_data.py (1)
create_project(96-122)
backend/app/crud/organization.py (2)
backend/app/tests/api/routes/test_org.py (2)
test_update_organization(51-70)test_create_organization(20-36)backend/app/alembic/versions/99f4fc325617_add_organization_project_setup.py (1)
upgrade(20-72)
🔇 Additional comments (15)
backend/app/crud/project.py (4)
1-1: LGTM: Standard logging import.The logging import is correctly placed and follows Python conventions.
10-11: LGTM: Proper logger instantiation.Using
__name__for logger creation follows Python best practices and enables hierarchical logging configuration.
20-22: LGTM: Appropriate success logging.The info-level logging after successful project creation is well-placed and includes relevant identifiers. The structured format with function name prefix aids in log filtering and debugging.
42-44: LGTM: Comprehensive validation logging.The warning-level logs before HTTP exceptions provide excellent traceability for debugging project validation failures. Both scenarios (not found and inactive) are properly logged with relevant context.
Also applies to: 48-50
backend/app/api/routes/project.py (3)
1-1: LGTM: Standard logging import.The logging import is correctly placed at the top of the module.
19-19: LGTM: Proper logger instantiation.Logger creation using
__name__follows Python logging best practices.
102-102: LGTM: Consistent deletion logging.The logging pattern matches the update endpoint, providing consistent monitoring across project management operations. Warning for not found cases and info for successful deletions are appropriately placed.
Also applies to: 107-109
backend/app/api/routes/organization.py (4)
1-1: LGTM: Standard logging import.The logging import is correctly positioned at the top of the module.
22-22: LGTM: Proper logger instantiation.Using
__name__for logger creation enables proper hierarchical logging configuration.
79-81: LGTM: Well-structured organization update logging.The logging approach is sound with appropriate warning and info levels. The multi-line formatting enhances readability, and the use of quotes around field names is consistent with the CRUD layer formatting style.
Also applies to: 90-92
106-108: LGTM: Consistent deletion logging.The logging pattern matches the update operation, providing uniform monitoring across organization management endpoints. The warning and info levels are appropriately used for error and success cases.
Also applies to: 113-115
backend/app/crud/organization.py (4)
1-1: LGTM: Standard logging import.The logging import is properly positioned at the module's top.
10-11: LGTM: Proper logger instantiation.Logger creation using
__name__follows Python logging best practices and enables hierarchical configuration.
22-24: LGTM: Appropriate creation logging.The info-level logging after successful organization creation is well-positioned and includes relevant identifiers. The structured format with function name prefix facilitates log filtering and monitoring.
46-48: LGTM: Comprehensive validation logging.The warning-level logs before HTTP exceptions provide excellent debugging context for organization validation failures. Both scenarios (not found and inactive) are properly captured.
Also applies to: 52-54
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved
Summary
This PR includes logs only for a subset of endpoints as a first step.
Target issue is #255
Checklist
Before submitting a pull request, please ensure that you mark these task.
fastapi run --reload app/main.pyordocker compose upin the repository root and test.Summary by CodeRabbit