Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some Projects that are Available for Future Work #83

Open
2 of 6 tasks
mmcky opened this issue Dec 16, 2015 · 16 comments
Open
2 of 6 tasks

Some Projects that are Available for Future Work #83

mmcky opened this issue Dec 16, 2015 · 16 comments

Comments

@mmcky
Copy link
Contributor

mmcky commented Dec 16, 2015

Some topics that are available to be worked on

Code Library

Notebooks

Infrastructure

  • Improve testing infrastructure by running Julia notebooks and checking for any runtime errors. QuantEcon.applications contains some starting code which is used to run python notebooks using the runipy project
@albep
Copy link
Contributor

albep commented Jan 2, 2016

I should've fixed the issue in ddp_theory_jl.ipynb. The only other Julia notebook is ddp_ex_job_search_jl.ipynb but I don't see errors there. Are there other notebooks with errors?

@mmcky
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmcky commented Jan 4, 2016

thanks @albep for the update. I will review and merge your PR today. There are some python notebooks that also need to be ported to Julia. For example:

https://github.com/QuantEcon/QuantEcon.applications/blob/master/discrete_dp/discrete_dp_solutions_py.ipynb

needs to be ported to julia so that we can post a DiscreteDP lecture for the Julia side of the website.

@albep
Copy link
Contributor

albep commented Jan 5, 2016

@mmcky That sounds good, I'll start working on porting the notebooks

@jstac
Copy link
Contributor

jstac commented Jan 5, 2016

Thanks @albep . If you step through the Julia lectures you might find others that are missing solution notebooks.

@mmcky Thanks for organizing.

@albep
Copy link
Contributor

albep commented Jan 23, 2016

I've implemented the State-Action Pair Formulation in ddp.jl. I've also tested it a bit and, for instance, it matches the results in this notebook: https://github.com/QuantEcon/QuantEcon.applications/blob/master/discrete_dp/discrete_dp_solutions_py.ipynb

I'm sure someone more proficient than me with Julia can polish it, but it could be a starting point. Before I start implementing Sparse Matrix Support, would anyone like to take a look at it? Shall I proceed with a PR?

@sglyon
Copy link
Member

sglyon commented Jan 23, 2016

Good work!

Let's open up a pull request and I'll look at it. Thanks

// Spencer
On Jan 23, 2016 5:31 PM, "albep" notifications@github.com wrote:

I've implemented the State-Action Pair Formulation in ddp.jl. I've also
tested it a bit and, for instance, it matches the results in this notebook:
https://github.com/QuantEcon/QuantEcon.applications/blob/master/discrete_dp/discrete_dp_solutions_py.ipynb

I'm sure someone more proficient than me with Julia can polish it, but it
could be a starting point. Before I start implementing Sparse Matrix
Support, would anyone like to take a look at it? Shall I proceed with a PR?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#83 (comment)
.

@Dawny33
Copy link

Dawny33 commented Mar 9, 2016

I would like to help with code porting from Python to Julia.

So, if they aren't already being worked upon, I'd be up for it!

@sglyon
Copy link
Member

sglyon commented Mar 9, 2016

Glad you want to help out! right now I don't think there are any open issues for things that need to be ported from Python to Julia.

@QuantEcon/lead-developers can anyone else think of one that I'm missing?

That being said there's plenty of work to be done if you are interested in helping out.

@oyamad
Copy link
Member

oyamad commented Mar 9, 2016

cyclic_classes is missing for MarkovChain. The task will be to port the cyclic_classes method of DiGraph to Julia (and perhaps include it in LightGraphs.jl) and call it from mc_tools.jl. See also #32 and #56.

@thomassargent30
Copy link

Dear Spencer, what about the lectures on optimal taxes with incomplete
markets? Tom
On Mar 8, 2016 23:06, "Spencer Lyon" notifications@github.com wrote:

Glad you want to help out! right now I don't think there are any open
issues for things that need to be ported from Python to Julia.

@QuantEcon/lead-developers
https://github.com/orgs/QuantEcon/teams/lead-developers can anyone else
think of one that I'm missing?

That being said there's plenty of work to be done if you are interested in
helping out.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#83 (comment)
.

@sglyon
Copy link
Member

sglyon commented Mar 10, 2016

Dear Tom,

Yes this is a great idea! I had forgotten about the lecture material.

I quickly compared the table of contents on the Python side to the Julia side and saw that we are missing the following lectures on the Julia side:

  • The lake model (python code here)
  • "Adding bling" to the growth model (python code here)
  • Markov perfect equilibria: I believe we have the julia core algorithm code for this (nnash function in QuantEcon.jl), but maybe not for all the examples. Python code here
  • The Aiyagari Model. This relies on the DDP code, which we are almost finished with. If you are interested in working on this please let me know as that will provide motivation to finish the ddp codes sooner. Python code here
  • Dynamic Stackelberg Problems. Python code here
  • Optimal Taxation with State-Contingent Debt. Python code here
  • Optimal Taxation without State-Contingent Debt. Python code here

Feel free to tackle any of these!

@jstac
Copy link
Contributor

jstac commented Mar 10, 2016

@spencerlyon2 Thanks, this is a helpful list.

@Dawny33 Pease do feel free to tackle any of these. Note that the relevant repo for development and PRs is for the most part QuantEcon.applications rather than this one.

@Dawny33
Copy link

Dawny33 commented Mar 10, 2016

@spencerlyon2 Wow thank you, that's a long list! Would love to work on some of them!

@jstac Noted. Thanks for the heads-up!

@arnavs
Copy link
Member

arnavs commented Apr 12, 2016

@jstac @mmcky I'd be happy to bite off whatever I can chew. You guys have some familiarity with what I can do, so let me know where (if anywhere) I might be helpful.

@jstac
Copy link
Contributor

jstac commented Apr 12, 2016

Help is definitely appreciated.

I suggest that you take more time to read through the library first, trying different parts, experimenting, looking at everyone's code. Try to pick up their style of coding. Maybe have a look at the tests and see if you can improve them. Improving tests and documentation is a good place to start.

@arnavs
Copy link
Member

arnavs commented Apr 12, 2016

@jstac Sounds good. I'll start getting myself acquainted with the code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants