Skip to content

Conversation

@naromero77amd
Copy link

@naromero77amd naromero77amd commented Aug 25, 2025

This is a partial cherry-pick from upstream: pytorch#158887

The TunableOp UT appears to fail with different versions of ROCm, but the real issue is the that regex in the UT is incorrect. @jeffdaily discovered this when we upgraded the nightly wheels to ROCm 6.4.2 in upstream PyTorch.

Will resolve SWDEV-548689.

Cherry-picked to rocm7.0_internal_testing branch via #2588

@rocm-repo-management-api
Copy link

rocm-repo-management-api bot commented Aug 26, 2025

Jenkins build for 6895c0f3da0eb84b9e83bec1fc9938efb4401eea commit finished as FAILURE
Links: Blue Ocean view / Build artifacts

@jeffdaily jeffdaily merged commit 2653139 into release/2.7 Aug 26, 2025
0 of 2 checks passed
@jeffdaily jeffdaily deleted the release_/2.7_rocm_fix_tunableop_ut_validator branch August 26, 2025 16:33
@naromero77amd naromero77amd changed the title [ROCm][release/2.7] Bug fix TunableOp validator UT. [release/2.7][ROCm] Bug fix TunableOp validator UT. Aug 28, 2025
@naromero77amd
Copy link
Author

!cherry-pick --onto rocm7.0_internal_testing

dhonnappa-amd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 28, 2025
This is a partial cherry-pick from upstream:
pytorch#158887

The TunableOp UT appears to fail with different versions of ROCm, but
the real issue is the that regex in the UT is incorrect. @jeffdaily
discovered this when we upgraded the nightly wheels to ROCm 6.4.2 in
upstream PyTorch.

Will resolve SWDEV-548689.
@dhonnappa-amd
Copy link

Created branch autogenerated/rocm7.0_internal_testing_cherry-pick_pr-2576 and #2588

Comment processed by Build

jeffdaily pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2025
…idator UT. (#2588)

Cherry-pick of #2576

Co-authored-by: Nichols A. Romero <165712832+naromero77amd@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants