docs(utest): Add standardized documentation for core.irq (irq_tc.c) #10913
Conversation
Most test cases in `src/utest` lack standardized functional documentation, as tracked in issue RT-Thread#10895. This leads to high maintenance costs, difficulty for new contributors, and inefficient code reviews. Solution: This patch adds the full, standardized documentation block to `src/utest/irq_tc.c`, following the approved template. The documentation details: - Test Objectives and tested APIs - Test Scenarios (for `irq_test` and `interrupt_test`) - Verification Metrics (the `uassert` criteria) - Dependencies (Kconfig options and hardware) - Test Execution command and Expected Results This makes the test case's purpose and behavior immediately clear to future maintainers and reviewers. Relates to RT-Thread#10895 Signed-off-by: lhxj <2743257167@qq.com>
|
👋 感谢您对 RT-Thread 的贡献！Thank you for your contribution to RT-Thread! 为确保代码符合 RT-Thread 的编码规范，请在你的仓库中执行以下步骤运行代码格式化工作流（如果格式化CI运行失败）。 🛠 操作步骤 | Steps
完成后，提交将自动更新至 如有问题欢迎联系我们，再次感谢您的贡献！💐 |
📌 Code Review Assignment🏷️ Tag: kernelReviewers: GorrayLi ReviewSun hamburger-os lianux-mm wdfk-prog xu18838022837 Changed Files (Click to expand)
📊 Current Review Status (Last Updated: 2025-11-10 17:02 CST)
📝 Review Instructions
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds standardized documentation block for the IRQ (interrupt) test case to improve test maintainability and clarity. The documentation follows a structured template explaining test objectives, scenarios, verification metrics, dependencies, and expected results.
Key Changes
- Added comprehensive documentation block (lines 12-66) describing the test case structure and purpose
- Updated change log entry to reflect the documentation addition
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)
src/utest/irq_tc.c:1
- [Documentation/文档]: The documentation structure mixes template instructions with actual content, creating confusion.
English: Lines 16 and 18 appear to be template placeholders ("Clearly specify...", "List specific functions...") that should have been removed. These instructional prompts should not appear in the final documentation. The actual content (line 17 and lines 19-23) is correct. Remove the placeholder lines to keep only the substantive information.
中文：第16行和第18行看起来是应该删除的模板占位符（"Clearly specify..."、"List specific functions..."）。这些指导性提示不应出现在最终文档中。实际内容（第17行和第19-23行）是正确的。删除占位符行，仅保留实质性信息。
Suggested format:
* Test Objectives:
* - Validates the core kernel interrupt handling mechanisms
* - Tests the following APIs:
* - rt_interrupt_enter_sethook()
* - rt_interrupt_leave_sethook()
* .../*
src/utest/irq_tc.c:1
- [Documentation/文档]: Template instructions should be removed from documentation.
English: Lines 38-39 contain template instructions that should be removed. The actual verification metrics are properly documented in lines 40-45.
中文：第38-39行包含应该删除的模板指令。实际的验证指标已在第40-45行正确记录。
/*
src/utest/irq_tc.c:1
- [Documentation/文档]: Template instructions mixed with actual content reduce readability.
English: Lines 48, 51, and 54 are template category headers with examples in parentheses. Remove the parenthetical examples (e.g., "e.g., specific peripherals") to present the actual requirements more clearly.
中文：第48、51和54行是带有括号示例的模板类别标题。删除括号中的示例（如"e.g., specific peripherals"），以更清晰地展示实际要求。
Suggested format:
* Dependencies:
* - Hardware requirements:
* - Requires a hardware timer to generate the SysTick (system tick) interrupt
* (This is met by the qemu-virt64-riscv BSP)
* - Software configuration:
* - `RT_USING_UTEST` must be enabled (`RT-Thread Utestcases`)
* .../*
src/utest/irq_tc.c:1
- [Documentation/文档]: Template instructions should be removed from documentation.
English: Lines 61 and 63 contain template instructions ("System behavior...", "Observable outcomes...") that should be removed. Keep only the actual expected results (lines 62, 64-65).
中文：第61和63行包含应该删除的模板指令（"System behavior..."、"Observable outcomes..."）。仅保留实际的预期结果（第62、64-65行）。
/*
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In progress
to Done
in 单元测试（UTEST）Framework
3 participants
Relates to #10895
拉取/合并请求描述：(PR description)
[
为什么提交这份PR (why to submit this PR)
Most test cases in
src/utestlack standardized functional documentation, as tracked in issue #10895. This leads to high maintenance costs, difficulty for new contributors, and inefficient code reviews.你的解决方案是什么 (what is your solution)
Solution:
This patch adds the full, standardized documentation block to
src/utest/irq_tc.c, following the approved template.The documentation details:
irq_testandinterrupt_test)uassertcriteria)This makes the test case's purpose and behavior immediately clear to future maintainers and reviewers.
请提供验证的bsp和config (provide the config and bsp)
]
当前拉取/合并请求的状态 Intent for your PR
必须选择一项 Choose one (Mandatory):
代码质量 Code Quality：
我在这个拉取/合并请求中已经考虑了 As part of this pull request, I've considered the following:
#if 0代码，不包含已经被注释了的代码 All redundant code is removed and cleaned up