Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update doi entries per JSS request #1186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 13, 2021
Merged

Conversation

eddelbuettel
Copy link
Member

This small and focussed PR responds to a request from JSS emailed in by @zeileis on behalf of the editors. It simply updates from using explicit URLs / URLs with www.jstatsoft to using \doi{}, doi:..., or doi.org in references. It addresses the points he highlighted, I will do another separate pass for the bib file.

Checklist

  • Code compiles correctly
  • R CMD check still passes all tests
  • Prefereably, new tests were added which fail without the change
  • Document the changes by file in ChangeLog

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1186 (b1357d3) into master (743bef2) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1186   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.44%   97.44%           
=======================================
  Files          64       64           
  Lines        2781     2781           
=======================================
  Hits         2710     2710           
  Misses         71       71           

Copy link
Member

@Enchufa2 Enchufa2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel merged commit b883b03 into master Oct 13, 2021
@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel deleted the feature/doi_updates branch October 13, 2021 19:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants