Skip to content

Conversation

@thomasnield
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @stepango,

I took your 2.x fork, made some changes to reflect what we did with 1.x, and pushed it as branch 2.x-dev on the main repository.

I swept to make sure that all Flowable and Observable variants were created, and remove any API that was removed in 1.x.

I'll review again tomorrow to make sure nothing was missed, but this may be a good place to start considering a release candidate for 2.x. Let me know what you think.

@thomasnield
Copy link
Collaborator Author

thomasnield commented Mar 8, 2017

I think we should move package convention from rx.lang.kotlin to io.reactivex.rxkotlin to match Maven coordinates.

We can do that last after we review and merge.

@thomasnield thomasnield mentioned this pull request Mar 8, 2017
@thomasnield
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I'll figure out why tests are failing as well...

@thomasnield
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Okay, fixed all test issues. Feel free to take a look at this branch. After that, I will move to the new package convention, archive the old 2.x under "2.x-old", and create a new "2x". The package rename will make the conflicts not worthwhile to address, and therefore no good reason to merge.

@stepango
Copy link
Collaborator

stepango commented Mar 9, 2017

Thanks, @thomasnield looks good. I'll go through 1.0 and 2.0 RC once more to double check if anything is missed from the RC's.

Closed #94

@thomasnield thomasnield merged commit 3e005e6 into 2.x Mar 11, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants