Skip to content

Conversation

@dbasunag
Copy link
Collaborator

@dbasunag dbasunag commented Nov 11, 2025

Assisted-by: Claude code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added comprehensive Polarion test coverage for approval/removal workflows and verify-requirements checks, covering CLI behavior (success/failure, missing params, config-file precedence), logging/verbose modes, project-id and branch handling, edge cases for added/removed IDs, and exit/control-flow validation.
  • Chores
    • Raised coverage fail-under threshold from 60% to 70%.

Signed-off-by: Debarati Basu-Nag <dbasunag@redhat.com>
Assisted-by: Claude code
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds two new Polarion-focused test modules exercising CLI and helper flows, and raises coverage fail-under in pyproject.toml from 60 to 70.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
New test module: set_automated
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py
Adds extensive tests for polarion_set_automated flows: approve_tests, remove_approved_tests, and the polarion_approve_automate Click command. Covers success/failure paths, empty/None inputs, overlap handling, config-file and CLI precedence, verbose logging, and asserts mocked call arguments and exit codes.
New test module: verify_tc_requirements
tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py
Adds comprehensive tests for polarion_verify_tc_requirements.has_verify: success/failure when requirements missing, branch handling, added-ID filtering, config-file/project-id precedence, verbose logging, short flags, and validation call assertions via mocks.
Manifest / config
pyproject.toml
Increases coverage threshold: [tool.coverage.report].fail_under changed from 60 to 70. No source API changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

  • Attention points:
    • Correctness and completeness of many mocked interactions and asserted call arguments across scenarios.
    • CLI behavior: exit codes and precedence between CLI flags and config file.
    • Edge cases around empty/None/overlapping ID lists and verbose logging assertions.
    • Intent behind increasing coverage fail_under in pyproject.toml.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

size/L, can-be-merged

Suggested reviewers

  • myakove
  • rnetser

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Add new polarion tests' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive language that lacks specificity about which tests or what functionality is being added. Make the title more specific and descriptive. Examples: 'Add polarion coverage and verification tests' or 'Add comprehensive test modules for polarion automation'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch add_tests

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e86152 and 8a34d04.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py
  • tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@redhat-qe-bot1
Copy link
Collaborator

Report bugs in Issues

Welcome! 🎉

This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features:

🔄 Automatic Actions

  • Reviewer Assignment: Reviewers are automatically assigned based on the "
    "OWNERS file in the repository root
    "
    "* Size Labeling: PR size labels (XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL) are "
    "automatically applied based on changes
    "
    f"* Issue Creation: A tracking issue is created for this PR and will be closed when the PR is merged or closed
    "
    "* Pre-commit Checks: pre-commit runs "
    "automatically if .pre-commit-config.yaml exists
    "
  • Branch Labeling: Branch-specific labels are applied to track the target branch
  • Auto-verification: Auto-verified users have their PRs automatically marked as verified

📋 Available Commands

PR Status Management

  • /wip - Mark PR as work in progress (adds WIP: prefix to title)
  • /wip cancel - Remove work in progress status
  • /hold - Block PR merging (approvers only)
  • /hold cancel - Unblock PR merging
  • /verified - Mark PR as verified
  • /verified cancel - Remove verification status
  • /reprocess - Trigger complete PR workflow reprocessing (useful if webhook failed or configuration changed)

Review & Approval

  • /lgtm - Approve changes (looks good to me)
  • /approve - Approve PR (approvers only)
  • /automerge - Enable automatic merging when all requirements are met (maintainers and approvers only)
  • /assign-reviewers - Assign reviewers based on OWNERS file
  • /assign-reviewer @username - Assign specific reviewer
  • /check-can-merge - Check if PR meets merge requirements

Testing & Validation

  • /retest tox - Run Python test suite with tox
  • /retest python-module-install - Test Python package installation
  • /retest all - Run all available tests

Container Operations

  • /build-and-push-container - Build and push container image (tagged with PR number)
    • Supports additional build arguments: /build-and-push-container --build-arg KEY=value

Cherry-pick Operations

  • /cherry-pick <branch> - Schedule cherry-pick to target branch when PR is merged
    • Multiple branches: /cherry-pick branch1 branch2 branch3

Label Management

  • /<label-name> - Add a label to the PR
  • /<label-name> cancel - Remove a label from the PR

✅ Merge Requirements

This PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:

  1. Approval: /approve from at least one approver
  2. LGTM Count: Minimum 0 /lgtm from reviewers
  3. Status Checks: All required status checks must pass
  4. No Blockers: No WIP, hold, or conflict labels
  5. Verified: PR must be marked as verified (if verification is enabled)

📊 Review Process

Approvers and Reviewers

Approvers:

  • dbasunag
  • myakove
  • rnetser

Reviewers:

  • dbasunag
  • myakove
  • rnetser
Available Labels
  • hold
  • verified
  • wip
  • lgtm
  • approve
  • automerge

💡 Tips

  • WIP Status: Use /wip when your PR is not ready for review
  • Verification: The verified label is automatically removed on each new commit
  • Cherry-picking: Cherry-pick labels are processed when the PR is merged
  • Container Builds: Container images are automatically tagged with the PR number
  • Permission Levels: Some commands require approver permissions
  • Auto-verified Users: Certain users have automatic verification and merge privileges

For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (2)

387-406: Remove unused mock parameter.

The mock_approve parameter is not used in this test since find_polarion_ids returns an empty list, meaning approve_tests is never invoked.

Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary mock:

     @patch("apps.polarion.polarion_set_automated.get_polarion_project_id")
     @patch("apps.polarion.polarion_set_automated.find_polarion_ids")
-    @patch("apps.polarion.polarion_set_automated.approve_tests")
     @patch("apps.polarion.polarion_set_automated.remove_approved_tests")
-    def test_command_custom_config_file_path(self, mock_remove, mock_approve, mock_find, mock_get_project):
+    def test_command_custom_config_file_path(self, mock_remove, mock_find, mock_get_project):

411-435: Remove unused mock parameter.

The mock_approve parameter is not used in this test since find_polarion_ids returns an empty list, meaning approve_tests is never invoked.

Apply this diff to remove the unnecessary mock:

     @patch("apps.polarion.polarion_set_automated.get_polarion_project_id")
     @patch("apps.polarion.polarion_set_automated.find_polarion_ids")
-    @patch("apps.polarion.polarion_set_automated.approve_tests")
     @patch("apps.polarion.polarion_set_automated.remove_approved_tests")
-    def test_command_project_id_override_config(self, mock_remove, mock_approve, mock_find, mock_get_project):
+    def test_command_project_id_override_config(self, mock_remove, mock_find, mock_get_project):
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0346fa7 and 90cd3ab.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1)
apps/polarion/polarion_set_automated.py (3)
  • approve_tests (15-19)
  • polarion_approve_automate (59-95)
  • remove_approved_tests (22-45)
🪛 Ruff (0.14.4)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py

357-357: Unpacked variable args is never used

Prefix it with an underscore or any other dummy variable pattern

(RUF059)


387-387: Unused method argument: mock_approve

(ARG002)


411-411: Unused method argument: mock_approve

(ARG002)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (3)

20-74: LGTM! Well-structured test coverage.

The test methods follow best practices with clear AAA pattern, appropriate mocking, and comprehensive assertions on both return values and function call arguments.


76-174: LGTM! Excellent edge case coverage.

The tests thoroughly cover the overlap logic between added and removed IDs (lines 89-92, 106), None handling, and various failure scenarios. The validation of set difference behavior is particularly well done.


1-435: Excellent test coverage overall!

This test file provides comprehensive coverage of the polarion_set_automated module with well-structured tests following best practices. The tests effectively use mocking to isolate units under test, cover both success and failure paths, and validate edge cases like ID overlap logic and conditional execution flows.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1)

333-361: Consider more robust path assertion.

The test correctly validates config file usage, but line 360 uses .endswith() which could be fragile if the default config path construction changes.

Consider validating just the key components rather than the exact path suffix:

-                assert kwargs["config_file_path"].endswith("/.config/python-utility-scripts/config.yaml")
+                assert ".config/python-utility-scripts/config.yaml" in kwargs["config_file_path"]
+                assert kwargs["config_file_path"].endswith("config.yaml")

Note: Line 358's unused args variable has been previously flagged for replacement with underscore.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1)

106-106: Replace unused variable with underscore.

The args variable is unpacked but never used in the test.

Apply this diff:

-        args, kwargs = mock_update.call_args
+        _, kwargs = mock_update.call_args
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 90cd3ab and 3246351.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1)
apps/polarion/polarion_set_automated.py (3)
  • approve_tests (15-19)
  • polarion_approve_automate (59-95)
  • remove_approved_tests (22-45)
🪛 Ruff (0.14.4)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py

106-106: Unpacked variable args is never used

Prefix it with an underscore or any other dummy variable pattern

(RUF059)


358-358: Unpacked variable args is never used

Prefix it with an underscore or any other dummy variable pattern

(RUF059)


388-388: Unused method argument: mock_approve

(ARG002)


412-412: Unused method argument: mock_approve

(ARG002)

🔇 Additional comments (6)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (6)

20-74: Well-structured test coverage for approve_tests.

The test class provides comprehensive coverage with clear test cases for success, partial failures, and empty input scenarios. Mock usage is appropriate and assertions verify both call arguments and return values.


114-175: Excellent edge case coverage.

These tests thoroughly cover important edge cases including no removals, complete overlap with added IDs, None parameter handling, and failure scenarios. The test logic correctly validates the behavior of the added_ids or [] pattern and set difference operations.


188-295: Solid test coverage for command success and edge cases.

These tests effectively validate:

  • Successful execution flow with proper mock interactions
  • Exit code 1 on both add and remove failures
  • Missing required parameter handling
  • Behavior when no added IDs are found (correctly verifying approve_tests is not called)

299-331: Good verification of verbose logging behavior.

The test correctly validates that the --verbose flag enables DEBUG level logging for both the main logger and the utilities logger.


365-407: Comprehensive CLI configuration and failure testing.

These tests provide excellent coverage of:

  • Combined add/remove failure handling
  • Custom config file path support
  • Proper get_polarion_project_id integration

Note: The mock_approve parameter at line 388 is flagged by Ruff as unused, but this is a false positive—it's required by the @patch decorator stacking order (decorators apply bottom-up to function parameters).


408-436: Good validation of CLI parameter precedence.

The test correctly verifies that --project-id from the command line takes precedence over config file values, and that get_polarion_project_id is not invoked when the CLI parameter is provided.

Note: The mock_approve parameter at line 412 is flagged by Ruff as unused, but this is a false positive—it's required by the @patch decorator stacking order.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1)

358-361: Replace unused positional capture from call_args.

Same Ruff warning as before—drop the unused positional tuple.

-                args, kwargs = mock_get_project.call_args
+                _, kwargs = mock_get_project.call_args
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3246351 and 175718c.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • pyproject.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py (2)
apps/polarion/polarion_verify_tc_requirements.py (1)
  • has_verify (23-40)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (5)
  • setup_method (180-182)
  • test_command_verbose_logging (299-330)
  • test_command_uses_config_file_project_id (333-360)
  • test_command_custom_config_file_path (388-406)
  • test_command_project_id_override_config (412-436)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (1)
apps/polarion/polarion_set_automated.py (3)
  • approve_tests (15-19)
  • polarion_approve_automate (59-95)
  • remove_approved_tests (22-45)
🪛 Ruff (0.14.4)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py

63-63: Local variable result is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable result

(F841)


153-153: Unpacked variable args is never used

Prefix it with an underscore or any other dummy variable pattern

(RUF059)


288-288: Local variable result is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable result

(F841)


340-340: Local variable result is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable result

(F841)


379-379: Local variable result is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable result

(F841)

tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py

106-106: Unpacked variable args is never used

Prefix it with an underscore or any other dummy variable pattern

(RUF059)


358-358: Unpacked variable args is never used

Prefix it with an underscore or any other dummy variable pattern

(RUF059)


388-388: Unused method argument: mock_approve

(ARG002)


412-412: Unused method argument: mock_approve

(ARG002)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: can-be-merged
  • GitHub Check: can-be-merged
  • GitHub Check: python-module-install
  • GitHub Check: tox

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py (1)

153-153: Fix unused variable from unpacking.

The args variable is unpacked but never used. Replace it with _ to indicate it's intentionally discarded.

Apply this diff:

-            args, kwargs = mock_get_project.call_args
+            _, kwargs = mock_get_project.call_args
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 175718c and 2e86152.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pyproject.toml
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py (2)
apps/polarion/polarion_verify_tc_requirements.py (1)
  • has_verify (23-40)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_set_automated_coverage.py (5)
  • setup_method (180-182)
  • test_command_verbose_logging (299-330)
  • test_command_uses_config_file_project_id (333-360)
  • test_command_custom_config_file_path (388-406)
  • test_command_project_id_override_config (412-436)
🪛 Ruff (0.14.4)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py

153-153: Unpacked variable args is never used

Prefix it with an underscore or any other dummy variable pattern

(RUF059)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: can-be-merged
  • GitHub Check: can-be-merged
  • GitHub Check: python-module-install
  • GitHub Check: tox
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/polarion/test_polarion_verify_tc_requirements_coverage.py (1)

1-21: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.

The module docstring, imports, and test class setup follow best practices for testing Click commands with pytest.

@dbasunag
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/approve
/lgtm

@dbasunag
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/verified

@dbasunag dbasunag merged commit 434927c into main Nov 12, 2025
6 checks passed
@dbasunag dbasunag deleted the add_tests branch November 12, 2025 22:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants